Re: RFC: out-of-tree module udebs
Max Vozeler <max@nusquama.org> writes:
> Approach 1: Building module udebs in linux-kernel-di-*
<...>
> About the delay: It could be reduced by including all modules
> in linux-modules-extra-2.6, which is automatically updated
> whenever a new kernel version/ABI gets uploaded.
Why not just add support to mark a module supporting d-i udebs and
teach linux-modules-extra-2.6 to build them. That would allow us to
have just one point to change/improve/fix for them.
I'm aware of the problem with conflicts and like but that's a problem
that needs a fix. I don't think it should be used as base for a
decision.
Doing that would remove the needing work from d-i team and letting
maintainers to help kernel team supporting it out of d-i main modules.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: