Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:46:57 +0200 with message-id <20060913214657.GB20767@slurpy> and subject line fixed with ttf-cjk-compact (1.5) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Missing glyphs
- From: Davide Viti <zinosat@tiscali.it>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 19:39:44 +0200
- Message-id: <20060603173944.GA9528@slurp>
Package: ttf-cjk-compact-udeb Version: 1.3 Tags: d-i Checking the needed glyphs on the spellchecker page [1], looks like the following glyphs are missing from ja.ttf files: <U4E8C> <U4E92> <U53CE> <U54C1> <U5546> <U5F71> <U6839> <U6B20> <U6D3E> <U76E3> <U88DC> <U9665> <U97FF> <UFFFD> and the following are missing from zh.ttf (and needed by zh_TW) <U68C4> <U8CE6> regards, Davide [1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/spellcheck/level1/index.htmlAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 370150-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: fixed with ttf-cjk-compact (1.5)
- From: Davide Viti <zinosat@tiscali.it>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:46:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20060913214657.GB20767@slurpy>
Package: ttf-cjk-compact-udeb Version: 1.5 All missing glyphs have been included with the upload of version 1.5 of the package, thus closing the BR regards, DavideAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---