Bug#375491: yet another lvm_removal_on_demand patch suggestion

[David Härdeman <david@2gen.com>]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:39:58AM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> And here's an updated patch. This one is tested and works with one 
> exception: if you do an automated partman-auto-lvm install two times in 
> a row, the parted server seems to become confused and the manual 
> partitioning screen is messed up thereafter.
>
> This still needs fixing but I'm unsure of what goes wrong and why (note 
> that the idea of a "disappearing" disk, which is what a VG/LV removal 
> looks like to parted, has not been tried yet in partman-* as far as I 
> know).
>
> I've CC:ed Colin Watson who perhaps knows a bit more than me about 
> parted_server?
>
> Latest patch attached...(the section under the "Make sure that parted 
> has no stale LVM info" is what needs to be checked)...

Nevermind, I found a fix for this problem. I've committed the fixed 
patch to SVN today.

Regards,
David