[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255042:



Thanks for following up.  I don't have that machine anymore so I wouldn't know
if tg3 is better these days or not :).

-Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Max Vozeler [mailto:max@nusquama.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 7:59 AM
To: 255042-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#255042:

On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:56:33AM -0400, Stephen Roylance wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> 
> >* Stephen Roylance <StephenRoylance@mass.rr.com> [2004-06-18 11:07]:
> >>I went back to the beta4 installer disk and the system is up and running 
> >>now.  When I had the problem I looked at the other virtual consoles, but 
> >
> >You have to do it with the tc1 image and you've to do it exactly when
> >it fails.
> >
> >Hmm, are you installing 2.6 or 2.4?
>
> I went back and tried installing again.  I didn't want to kill the 
> working system, so I formatted the swap partition and installed to 
> that.  The base install did not fail.

Thank you for following up. 

Processing old installation reports, I noticed your 2004 report
of two problems with the installer: 

 1) The base install failure (resolved)
 
 2) Kernel 2.6 not detecting and loading the tg3 module for your
    NIC. The tg3 driver has seen many updates and there have been
    reports of successful detection since, so I would expect the
    detection to work now. If the detection of tg3 still doesn't
    work on your system, it would be great if you could reply to
    this bug and send the output of lspci and lspci -n.

I'm closing this report based on the expectation that tg3
detection should now be working correctly. If this is not the
case, please let us know so we can reopen the report.

cheers,
Max




Reply to: