Hi Otavio, On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:10:15PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow: > - A new grub package would be uploaded to unstable having a group of > wrappers that will call /usr/sbin utilities but warn the user to > edit his/her /etc/kernel-img.conf. That keeps backward > compatibility with previous kernels and will be in place until Etch > is released, > - A NEWS.Debian entry describing the change in grub would be add too, > - grub-installer would have a change to don't use full paths in > kernel-img.conf entries _but_ this one need to migrate to etch > together with linux-2.6 2.6.17-6 OR new installations will be > broken. Could you please expand on this last point? What does "together" mean -- both at the same time, or one before the other (which one?)? Why does a kernel-img.conf without a full path break older kernels? Other than this, the plan sounds ok. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature