[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#380049: debian-installer/etch bug report



Package: installation-reports

Boot method: netinst iso, cdrom boot
Image version: etch beta2 & daily July 26, 2006
Date: July 26th evening.

Machine: AMD CPU, NForce2 mobo Chipset.
Processor:  AMD Athlon XP 2500+
Memory:  512 MB
Partitions:
this is typed in by hand since I can't boot the system:
hda, hdc both 120 GB disks:
hda1:  50 MB ext3 mounted to /boot
hda2: 650 MB swap
hda5: (rest) raid autodetect

hdc1: 700 swap
hdc5: (test) raid autodetect

hdf/hdg: exists but dont take part of the installation in any way.


Output of lspci and lspci -n:
(missing)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O ]
Config network:         [O ]
Detect CD:              [O ]
Load installer modules: [O ]
Detect hard drives:     [ O]
Partition hard drives:  [ O]
Create file systems:    [O ]
Mount partitions:       [O ]
Install base system:    [O ]
Install boot loader:    [ O]
Reboot:                 [ O]

Comments/Problems:
The machine is set to install on /dev/md0 raid1.  The installer worked
like a charm, and on reboot into the live system I end up with major
failure, the scripts try to start the raid system with mdrun but I end
up with the error;

"mdadm: cannon open device /dev/hda5: Device or resource busy"

When I attempt to mount /dev/hda1 I end up with the same error.


An installation using guided partition onto hda only succeeds, and the
system boots up fine.

The hardware I have installed is:
- PVR-250 capture card
- Ethernet card
- GForce2 MX
- PATA IDE interface providing hdf/hdg

I was going to try installs without various cards, but considering the
base install works fine, it didn't look like a hardware
conflict/issue.

If you _need_ any of the above, I'll see what I can do, generally
rescue doesnt work for me because it doesnt seem to detect the raid1
and offer that as a 'root' option.



Reply to: