[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#379435: installation report



Package: installation-reports

Boot method: mini_iso>
Image version: <faily image 21-7-2006>
Date: <22-7-2006l>

Machine: <personnal desktop)>
Processor:intel 2600 (i686)
Memory: 512 Mo
Partitions: <
/dev/hdd1     ext3    65733352   2868204  59526040   5% /
tmpfs        tmpfs      258356         0    258356   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs        tmpfs       10240       148     10092   2% /dev
/dev/hda1     ntfs     8193116   7510436    682680  92% /mnt/hda1
/dev/hdd3     ntfs    53327764  47821960   5505804  90% /mnt/hdd3
>

Output of lspci and lspci -n:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge (rev 04)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 04)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 12)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801BA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 12)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801BA IDE U100 (rev 12)
00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 12)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM SMBus (rev 12)
00:1f.4 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 12)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] (rev a1)
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 30)
02:02.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB12LV26 IEEE-1394 Controller (Link)
02:03.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant CX23880/1/2/3 PCI Video and Audio Decoder (rev 05)
02:03.2 Multimedia controller: Conexant CX23880/1/2/3 PCI Video and Audio Decoder [MPEG Port] (rev 05)
02:05.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 50)
02:05.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 50)
02:05.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 51)
02:0b.0 Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 (rev 10)

00:00.0 0600: 8086:1a30 (rev 04)
00:01.0 0604: 8086:1a31 (rev 04)
00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev 12)
00:1f.0 0601: 8086:2440 (rev 12)
00:1f.1 0101: 8086:244b (rev 12)
00:1f.2 0c03: 8086:2442 (rev 12)
00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:2443 (rev 12)
00:1f.4 0c03: 8086:2444 (rev 12)
01:00.0 0300: 10de:0322 (rev a1)
02:00.0 0200: 10b7:9055 (rev 30)
02:02.0 0c00: 104c:8020
02:03.0 0400: 14f1:8800 (rev 05)
02:03.2 0480: 14f1:8802 (rev 05)
02:05.0 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 50)
02:05.1 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 50)
02:05.2 0c03: 1106:3104 (rev 51)
02:0b.0 0401: 13f6:0111 (rev 10)


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [E] ntf partition isn't create in fstab but in /tmp why?
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [E] not in my language preference (french) but the boot is ok
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:
The translation is not correct during the remote loading of the files. Grub is not in French.
The keyboard is not respected. At the time of the installation I chose swiss_french_latin but at the time of the seizure of the password it is the American keyboard.
Gnome also has an American keyboard. Why proposed firefox with epiphany? Why evolution is so interdependent of gnome. How to make to remove it? without removing gnome?
I transmitted a bug with gnome-cups-manager...
<Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
      and ideas you had during the initial install.>
The menus function well. It is easy. But I do not include/understand the menu captures. Because when there is a lack that does not function. For example to show a mistranslation. But most important it is that it misses a menu helps (in bottom on the left of the screen). With words simple and reassuring to explain what it is necessary to do. For example at the time of the choice of parcellings. Too much simplistic with my taste. One do not include/understand why choose such group.




Reply to: