Steve, you're right that we should ditch de4x5 from all the 2.6 packages (at least assuming that it's not in modules.pcimap on other arches; I only checked i386, and this module has in the past been used on some arches and not others). And it does need to stay in the 2.4 udebs at least for some arches. Although for most arches it's not actually used by d-i with 2.4 either; d-i blacklists it unless tulip is not available. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature