On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I either > upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of the > d-i svn like above. > > Now, someone else needs to modify nobootloader. He is not aware of my changes, > commits to the d-i svn, and uploads the package. My changes are lost. > > Next time i upload my changes, i may well not notice that there was another > upload, and the other changes are lost. (Well, probably not, because i will > have some svk based tool to merge those changes into my tree). > > So, we end up in a mess, because there is no more only a single authoritative > (or even juste a single) copy of the repository for the package. > > This is the reason why i am arguing against the current proposal which doesn't > restore my svn d-i access, and why i have not even tried to do any d-i work > since then. And there is the possiblity to send `svn diff` output to this list. Geert Stappers In an attempt to live with a clean break.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature