On Saturday 13 May 2006 16:24, Christian Perrier wrote: > The rationale of the language priority being set to high was similar > to all other questions: the answer is not absolutely mandatory for the > install to run, given that the installation can be run in English > without compromising the result. Well yes I know, but how useful is an installation in english if you don't understand it? > Of course, I understand your concerns here and changing the language > question could be imagined....the only drawback being that it would be > kind of a precedent for other questions being raised at "critical" > priority. > > I'd like to have other's advice and feeling about this. Yes would be nice :) > Indeed, that raises an interesting d-i enhancement possibility: why > not allow users to preseed....the questions priority rather than the > answers. Preeseding would be wonderful :) > This would allow CDD to adjust the questions priority to their needs > without changing the D-I code. And that is of course desirable, I *hate* the idea of doing a NMU for Debian-Edu Archive of localechooser. Greetings Steffen
Attachment:
pgpUIyuNbwcF_.pgp
Description: PGP signature