Bug#365010: Xserver G5 usb keyboard not loaded ...
- To: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Cc: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>, 365010@bugs.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#365010: Xserver G5 usb keyboard not loaded ...
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:30:17 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20060427113017.GW408@mails.so.argh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>, Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>, 365010@bugs.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Reply-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, 365010@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060427111920.GA18182@powerlinux.fr>
- References: <[🔎] 20060427101413.GA13668@powerlinux.fr> <[🔎] 200604271253.13487.aragorn@tiscali.nl> <[🔎] 20060427111920.GA18182@powerlinux.fr>
* Sven Luther (sven.luther@wanadoo.fr) [060427 13:23]:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 April 2006 12:14, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 1) daily build business card and netinst isos are failing to build
> > > since april 1, which means they don't include the broadcom tg3 module
> > > at all, and are thus not really usable for installs at this time.
> >
> > Reason is that prep and chrp d-i cdrom images are failing in daily d-i
> > builds. This results in debian-cd not being able to find a file needed
> > for mkisofs.
> >
> > I understand from comments on IRC that this is due to a kernel issue?
>
> Oh fun, i don't have any commit access to the d-i repo anymore, so i can't
> even fix this issue myself. This clearly shows the pettiness of the d-i team,
> i am disgusted. ...
>
> Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearly means that the debian support for
> powerpc is dead or almost so, and i strongly recomend you to go find another
> distribution to run which cares a bit more about the powerpc architecture.
I'd rather prefer if you don't overexegerate.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: