Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:18:12 -0400 with message-id <20060423221812.GA25305@kitenet.net> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: more ethernet device order fun
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:58:21 -0500
- Message-id: <20051208005821.GA24368@kitenet.net>
Package: hw-detect Severity: normal Installs on my ia64 from d-i daiy builds are ending up with eth0 being the device that does not have a cable on it (the tg3 card) and eth1 being the device with link (the e100 card). This is the opposite load order that d-i uses and it means the network doesn't come up in the installed system since there is only an entry for eth0 in /etc/network/interfaces. If I remove udev from the installed system, the modules are loaded in the same order as they are in d-i and everything works. -- see shy joAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 342498-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: fixed
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:18:12 -0400
- Message-id: <20060423221812.GA25305@kitenet.net>
This seems to have fixed itself in the past few days with udev's new persistent device naming support. -- see shy joAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---