Bug#350652: marked as done (install-report)
Your message dated Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:27:50 +0100
with message-id <20060202152750.GJ10662@gpm.stappers.nl>
and subject line succesfull with latest version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2006 00:46:34 +0000
>From frustapunk@tiscali.it Mon Jan 30 16:46:34 2006
Return-path: <frustapunk@tiscali.it>
Received: from smtp7.libero.it ([193.70.192.90])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F3jfG-00029a-7J
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:46:34 -0800
Received: from localhost (172.16.1.78) by smtp7.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01)
id 439D91A303BD8AD8 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:45:59 +0100
Received: from smtp20.libero.it ([172.16.1.76])
by localhost (asav20.libero.it [193.70.193.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 14852-15 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:45:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ppp-252-19.27-151.libero.it [151.27.19.252])
by smtp20.libero.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6F350759
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:45:58 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <43DEB468.80905@tiscali.it>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:50:48 +0100
From: FrustaPunk <frustapunk@tiscali.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: it, it-it, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: install-report
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="------------030101080308030607030105"
X-Scanned: with antispam and antivirus automated system at libero.it
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030101080308030607030105
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 31/31/2006
Machine: Motherboard: ASUS K8N4-E Deluxe; Chipset: NVIDIA nForce 4-4X
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3400; Storage: NVIDIA nForce 4-4X chipset support;
HardDisk SATA 200GB Memory 1GB; LAN: Marvell 88E81111 Gigabit LAN PHY
Partitions: <df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred>
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [O]
Detect network card: [E]
Configure network: [E]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [E]
Partition hard drives: [E]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Installed system ok: [ ]
Comments/Problems:
(sorry for my english!!!!):
I've changed my old motherbord with this one. My old Debian installation
work good with a 2.6.12 kernel, but is impossible for me to compile a
new kernel (system doesn't boot) or do a new install with netinst cd
becouse the debian-installer doesn't detect the hard drivers....
--
Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report.
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to submit@bugs.debian.org.
--
-------------------------------------------
LINUX: Live Free Or Die.
http://www.debian.org
http://www.kde.org
FrustaPunk
-------------------------------------------
--------------030101080308030607030105
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="install-report"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="install-report"
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 31/31/2006
Machine: Motherboard: ASUS K8N4-E Deluxe; Chipset: NVIDIA nForce 4-4X CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3400; Storage: NVIDIA nForce 4-4X chipset support; HardDisk SATA 200GB Memory 1GB; LAN: Marvell 88E81111 Gigabit LAN PHY
Partitions: <df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred>
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [O]
Detect network card: [E]
Configure network: [E]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [E]
Partition hard drives: [E]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Installed system ok: [ ]
Comments/Problems:
(sorry for my english!!!!):
I've changed my old motherbord with this one. My old Debian installation work good with a 2.6.12 kernel, but is impossible for me to compile a new kernel (system don't boot) or do a new install with netinst cd becouse the debian-installer doesn't detect the hard drivers....
--
Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report.
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to submit@bugs.debian.org.
--------------030101080308030607030105--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 350652-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2006 15:34:04 +0000
>From stappers@stappers.nl Thu Feb 02 07:34:04 2006
Return-path: <stappers@stappers.nl>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl ([213.84.119.166])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F4gTE-00005o-0J
for 350652-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:34:04 -0800
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AEBF2794A0; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:27:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:27:50 +0100
To: FrustaPunk <frustapunk@tiscali.it>, 350652-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: succesfull with latest version
Message-ID: <20060202152750.GJ10662@gpm.stappers.nl>
References: <43DEB468.80905@tiscali.it> <20060131055121.GK25850@djedefre.onera> <[🔎] 43E1D339.3030400@tiscali.it> <20060202110304.GI10662@gpm.stappers.nl> <[🔎] 43E1F6B5.7070302@tiscali.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 43E1F6B5.7070302@tiscali.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:10:29PM +0100, FrustaPunk wrote:
> Geert Stappers ha scritto:
<snip/>=20
> >
> >And at least try to provide the information that is requested.
> >
> >If you want to say that the latest version works,
> >then please say it clearly. So that we _all_ known wether attention is
> >needed or not for this bug report.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Geert Stappers
> >
>=20
> Sorry for my BAD BAD BAD English....
You are doing fine: you _care_ to communicate
(in other words: keep up the good intentions
(and don't worry about your English))
> I want just say that AFTER the first report I sent, I've tested this:=20
> [http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-test=
ing-amd64-binary-1.iso]
> and it WORKS; so, I will use that for my installation...
Okay, that is good news.
(and this time clearly understood ;-)
This bugreport is now closed.
> all the others versions (stable, unstable, netinst-stable,=20
> netinst-testing ecc.. ) DON'T WORK
>=20
> now, I've not more problems, but if I can help you with reports of=20
> non-working installation, I'll be very happy to do it....
We, this project, are interrested in working versions.
We assume that we deliver a working versions
and need reports from others with different hardware.
We are "happy" with reports of failures
but are really happy with succesfull install reports.
(especially on systems there where precious reported as broken)
Back to the question
How to help with reports of non-working installations?
A good thing is to ask the reporter what the current situation is.
And update the bugreport with the provided feedback.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD4iT2OSINbgwa/7sRApVdAKCTgjR2r1AmmI0te+FdNjuZNEkWzwCgiR+0
jHeDUzYwUIOxOXokCCTJ/aI=
=hEaZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--
Reply to: