On Monday 30 January 2006 01:56, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 09:08:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > (BCC to Stephen Marenka as principal d-i porter for m68k) > > No real need since I'm subscribed to both lists. :) Yeah, I know. Just wanted to make sure to get your attention :-) > > Could you please take a look at the issues below for m68k: > > - it looks like the kernel udebs for 2.4 have not yet been rebuilt > > against the latest 2.4.27 kernel (the security update) > > Well I uploaded that on Jan. 20 as 0.68, but I don't see what's > become of it. I see no commit in SVN for a 0.68 either... > I'm waiting on Christian to update linux-2.6. Right now, we're still > at 2.6.12-10. There's been some problems with the most recent 2.6 > kernels. Is m68k part of the integrated linux-2.6 source package? If not, you probably have a bit more freedom over which 2.6 version you go with for Beta2. Thanks for the reply.
Attachment:
pgp_UXUlIiYcT.pgp
Description: PGP signature