On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:10:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Andrew Pollock wrote: > > So, before we go doing this and breaking things, I thought it best to give > > people a bit of notice. My understanding is that dhcp3-client is too large, > > so maybe something like udhcpc (or apparently klibc has a DHCP client) > > instead? > udhcp and pump have proven to be broken in the past. I tried again to > fit the dhcp3 udeb onto our floppy, but that image, which has 93k free > with the dhcp2 udeb, gets over-full with the dhcp3 one. That 100k > (compressed; 300k uncompressed!) size difference is pretty amazing. AFAICT, the current dhcp3-udeb isn't being built with -Os. Someone ought to try this and see how much of a difference it makes. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature