Bug#291729: marked as done (Successful installation)
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:36:24 +0100
with message-id <200501271336.24978.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#291729: Successful installation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2005 19:43:54 +0000
>From voskuhl@web.de Sat Jan 22 11:43:53 2005
Return-path: <voskuhl@web.de>
Received: from relay1.tiscali.de (webmail.tiscali.de) [62.26.116.129]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CsRAn-0004ZI-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:43:53 -0800
Received: from voskuhl.homelinux.org (83.129.18.168) by webmail.tiscali.de (7.0.036.1)
id 41B8B6EA001D366C for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:43:52 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by voskuhl.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6166C027
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:49:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from voskuhl.homelinux.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (projectx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 10286-07 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:49:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from client.intern (client.intern [192.168.0.2])
by voskuhl.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89F46C026
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:49:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Jens Voskuhl <voskuhl@web.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Successful installation
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:49:19 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200501222049.20177.voskuhl@web.de>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at voskuhl.homelinux.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
20050121 from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/
uname -a:
Linux powerstation 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Thu Dec 30 18:13:12 JST 2004 i586 GNU/Linux
Date:
22.01.2005, 20:37 CET
Method:
network installation from ftp.de.debian.org, booted from
sarge-i386-netinst.iso, no proxy used, installation mode default (linux)
Machine:
Selfmade machine
Processor:
AMD-K6 3D, 400 Mhz
Memory:
62620 kB
Root Device:
IDE Seagate ST36531A, 6 GB
Root Size/partition table:
hda1 ext3 mount on /
hda2 swap
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598 [Apollo MVP3] (rev
04)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo
MVP3/Pro133x AGP]
0000:00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586/A/B PCI-to-ISA
[Apollo VP] (rev 47)
0000:00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
0000:00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1
Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:07.3 Bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586B ACPI (rev 10)
0000:00:09.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105 [Rhine-III]
(rev 86)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: 3Dfx Interactive, Inc. Voodoo Banshee
(rev 03)
0000:00:00.0 0600: 1106:0598 (rev 04)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 1106:8598
0000:00:07.0 0601: 1106:0586 (rev 47)
0000:00:07.1 0101: 1106:0571 (rev 06)
0000:00:07.2 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 02)
0000:00:07.3 0680: 1106:3040 (rev 10)
0000:00:09.0 0200: 1106:3106 (rev 86)
0000:01:00.0 0300: 121a:0003 (rev 03)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
No problems!
Greetings
Jens Voskuhl
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291729-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2005 12:36:52 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Thu Jan 27 04:36:52 2005
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cu8tI-0005BE-00; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 04:36:52 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.11] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1Cu8sn-0003Da-Gu; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:36:21 +0100
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: Jens Voskuhl <voskuhl@web.de>,
291729-done@bugs.debian.org,
290401-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#291729: Successful installation
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:36:24 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <[🔎] 200501222049.20177.voskuhl@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200501222049.20177.voskuhl@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200501271336.24978.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 291729-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Closing both your latest installation report #291729 and the older one
#290401 as it seems that the either the new kernel or the new initrdtools
has solved your problems.
It would have helped us if you had followed up to the original
installation report instead of submitting a new one, as both
installations concern the same machine. That would help us very much to
keep related information together.
Cheers,
FJP
Reply to: