Re: [patch] Defining apt sources using codename instead of suite

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Defining apt sources using codename instead of suite
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 18:29:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200510231829.57230.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20051023161144.GA6315@pluto>
References: <[🔎] 200510231711.32496.aragorn@tiscali.nl> <[🔎] 20051023161144.GA6315@pluto>

On Sunday 23 October 2005 18:11, Jens Seidel wrote:
> s/de/the/

Already noticed by svenl on IRC :-)

> Isn't free(directory); ... missing here?

No, I don't think so.

> > +	free(hostname);
> > +	free(directory);
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > +	free(suite);

Attachment: pgptpsH8WHxHm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Defining apt sources using codename instead of suite
  - From: Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net>

References:
- [patch] Defining apt sources using codename instead of suite
  - From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
- Re: [patch] Defining apt sources using codename instead of suite
  - From: Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] Defining apt sources using codename instead of suite
Next by Date: Final resolution for the kernel-package ramdisk handling project ...
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Defining apt sources using codename instead of suite
Next by thread: Re: [patch] Defining apt sources using codename instead of suite
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread