[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#283907: marked as done (contains debconf template that is never used)

Your message dated Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:39:48 +0100
with message-id <20051020193948.GF17009@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line [cjwatson@debian.org: Fixed in NMU of palo-installer 0.0.8]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2004 06:24:16 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Wed Dec 01 22:24:16 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CZkO0-0007T1-00; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:24:16 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D72518101
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu,  2 Dec 2004 06:24:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8B03A6E26E; Thu,  2 Dec 2004 01:25:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:25:47 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: contains debconf template that is never used
Message-ID: <20041202062547.GA12465@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: palo-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

The debconf template in palo-installer is never used, it just bloats the
package and the po files. I suggest removing it, unless someone has
plans to use it in the near future.

see shy jo

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)



Received: (at 283907-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 19:39:50 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Thu Oct 20 12:39:50 2005
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ESgGU-0005y1-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:39:50 -0700
Received: from riva.pelham.vpn.ucam.org (83-216-156-196.colinw664.adsl.metronet.co.uk [])
	by smtp.metronet.co.uk (MetroNet Mail) with ESMTP
	id E981B41848B; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:39:32 +0100 (BST)
Received: from cjwatson by riva.pelham.vpn.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ESgGS-0008FT-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:39:48 +0100
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:39:48 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 283907-done@bugs.debian.org, 308606-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [cjwatson@debian.org: Fixed in NMU of palo-installer 0.0.8]
Message-ID: <20051020193948.GF17009@riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 283907-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: palo-installer
Source-Version: 0.0.8

Not an NMU.

Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@debian.org]

----- Forwarded message from Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -----

From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>,
	Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Fixed in NMU of palo-installer 0.0.8
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:32:05 -0700
Delivered-To: cjwatson@master.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no 

tag 283907 + fixed
tag 308606 + fixed


This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:25:52 +0100
Source: palo-installer
Binary: palo-installer
Architecture: source hppa
Version: 0.0.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
 palo-installer - Install PALO on a hard disk (udeb)
Closes: 283907 308606
 palo-installer (0.0.8) unstable; urgency=medium
   [ Joey Hess ]
   * Remove unused debconf template. Closes: #283907
   * Remove useless extended package description. Closes: #308606
   * Simplify rules file.
   * Remove standards-version field (not applicable to a udeb).
   [ Colin Watson ]
   * Remove isinstallable file which checked for the presence of palo, so
     that we can remove palo from the base system and (as we do already)
     apt-install it later.
 9e787843d80e918a3e3dc2593780c67d 643 debian-installer standard palo-installer_0.0.8.dsc
 0a64ba60f931e62f6edea120bd660b84 4804 debian-installer standard palo-installer_0.0.8.tar.gz
 f7dfd36e89b2a65e193d14d98d5dbcde 1264 debian-installer standard palo-installer_0.0.8_hppa.udeb
Package-Type: udeb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)


----- End forwarded message -----

Reply to: