[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#334696: marked as done (installation-reports: [WiFi fail] All 2.6 kernels/NetISOs fail to find/configure WiFi Lucent GOLD card)



Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

>Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:29:32 +0200
>with message-id <200510192029.34798.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
>and subject line Bug#334696: installation-reports: [WiFi fail] All 2.6 kernels/NetISOs fail to find/configure WiFi Lucent GOLD card
>has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
>
>This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
>If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
>Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
>
>(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
>talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
>somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)
>
>Debian bug tracking system administrator
>(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
>--------------------------------------
>Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 10:35:27 +0000
>>From jari.aalto@cante.net Wed Oct 19 03:35:27 2005
>Return-path: <jari.aalto@cante.net>
>Received: from fep32-0.kolumbus.fi (fep32-app.kolumbus.fi) [193.229.0.63] 
>	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
>	id 1ESBI7-0004Zr-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:35:27 -0700
>Received: from bongo.cante.net ([81.197.0.130]) by fep32-app.kolumbus.fi
>          with ESMTP
>          id <20051019103524.IRRD20405.fep32-app.kolumbus.fi@bongo.cante.net>
>          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:35:24 +0300
>Received: from mx2.cante.net ([192.168.1.3] helo=cante)
>	by bongo.cante.net with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
>	id 1ESBI3-0003E2-Bu; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:35:23 +0300
>Received: from jaalto by cante with local (Exim 4.54)
>	id 1ESBI1-0008Dj-36; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:35:21 +0300
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>From: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
>To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
>Subject: installation-reports: [WiFi fail] All 2.6 kernels/NetISOs fail to
> find/configure WiFi Lucent GOLD card
>X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
>Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:35:19 +0300
>Message-Id: <E1ESBI1-0008Dj-36@cante>
>Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
>X-Spam-Level: 
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
>	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
>
>Package: installation-reports
>Version: 2005-10-15
>Severity: important
>
>I've used the NetINstall ISOs and noticed that after the change to
>kernel 2.6.x all the ISOs have been unable to
>
>- automatically find
>- or configure
>
>The standard WiFi card Lucent GOLD. The manual setup does not work
>either; the list is presented and I pick the correct card, but the
>installed still announces failure.
>
>With previous version of the NetInstall ISOs (2.4 line) the card
>is detected and configured automatically.
>
>The installation cannot be proceeded without working network
>connection.
>
>hwinfo(1) reports:
>
>39: PCMCIA 00.0: 0282 WLAN controller
>  [Created at pcmcia.120]
>  Unique ID: K1pk.jrBDbmL7DWA
>  Parent ID: 8otl.IR44dvWvxb8
>  Hardware Class: network
>  Model: "Lucent WaveLAN/IEEE"
>  Hotplug: PCMCIA
>  Socket: 0
>  Vendor: pcmcia 0x0156 "Lucent Technologies"
>  Device: pcmcia 0x0002 "WaveLAN/IEEE"
>  Features: WLAN
>  Driver Info #0:
>    Driver Status: orinoco_cs is active
>    Driver Activation Cmd: "modprobe orinoco_cs"
>  Extra Info: Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE, Version 01.01
>  Config Status: cfg=new, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown
>  Attached to: #14 (CardBus bridge)
>
>-- System Information:
>Debian Release: testing/unstable
>  APT prefers unstable
>  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
>Architecture: i386 (i686)
>Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
>Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
>
>---------------------------------------
>Received: (at 334696-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 18:29:20 +0000
>>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Wed Oct 19 11:29:20 2005
>Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
>Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.177] 
>	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
>	id 1ESIgi-0002Cn-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:29:20 -0700
>Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
>	by smtp-out2.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
>	id 1ESIgh-0007fL-TQ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:29:19 +0200
>From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
>To: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>,
> 334696-done@bugs.debian.org
>Subject: Re: Bug#334696: installation-reports: [WiFi fail] All 2.6 kernels/NetISOs fail to find/configure WiFi Lucent GOLD card
>Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:29:32 +0200
>User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
>References: <E1ESBI1-0008Dj-36@cante>
>In-Reply-To: <E1ESBI1-0008Dj-36@cante>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>  charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Message-Id: <200510192029.34798.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
>Delivered-To: 334696-done@bugs.debian.org
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
>X-Spam-Level: 
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
>	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
>
>On Wednesday 19 October 2005 12:35, Jari Aalto wrote:
>  
>
>>The standard WiFi card Lucent GOLD. The manual setup does not work
>>either; the list is presented and I pick the correct card, but the
>>installed still announces failure.
>>    
>>
>
>This is a known issue that has now been listed in our wiki [1] (with 
>workaround).
>
>As the problem has already been fixed in the installer and the fix will be 
>uploaded soon, I'm closing this report.
>
>Thanks for submitting your installation report.
>
>Cheers,
>FJP
>
>[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstallerToday
>
>
>  
>
TRY IT!! https://www.scientificlinux.org/



Reply to: