[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#328130: RM: please remove any remnant of 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels from etch/sid



On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:27:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:54:04AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I write this email to ask, now that linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 is in testing, there
> > > isn't any reason to keep those 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels around, A quick
> > > glance listed those :
> > 
> > (...)
> > 
> > > Also, if there are 2.6.8 kernels in sid/etch still, these can be removed as
> > > well.
> > 
> > Please see #317079, #322697 and and #323183. This report is a duplicate from
> > what's already in those three reports, so please followup to them where
> > appropriate. I already see a duplicate discussion on whether 2.6.8 can be
> > removed, so please coordinate in the -kernel team about this, I mailed -kernel
> > about it before, and there's a bug on the kernel package (#323183) about it.
> 
> First up I'd like to applogise for the confusion and multiple bug
> reports surrounding this. The simple truth is that the legacy
> of the Sarge-era kernel packaging has left us with a mess, that
> we are trying to sift through and slowly clean up. Its turning
> out to be quite complicated, and thats not something that
> you should have been asked to worry about.
> 
> I suggest that we just track this as 323183, rather than mucking around
> with opening and merging existing bugs. Please let me know if you would
> prefer a different approach.
> 
> I've just spent a bit of time looking through this and here
> is a summary of where I beleive we are, others, please comment
> if this is inaccurate or incomplete. If there are ammendments
> I'll try and correlate them into an updated list.
> 
> Already removed:
>   kernel-image-2.6.11-s390            (done in Bug #317079)
>   kernel-image-2.6.11-sparc           (done in Bug #317079)
>   kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.11         (done in Bug #317079)
>   kernel-source-2.6.11                (done in Bug #317079)
> 
>   kernel-image-2.6.10-alpha           (done in Bug #322697)
>   kernel-image-2.6.10-hppa            (done in Bug #322697)
>   kernel-image-2.6.10-sparc           (done in Bug #322697)
>   kernel-source-2.6.10                (done in Bug #322697)
> 
> Ready for removal by ftpmasters
>   kernel-source-2.4.24
>   kernel-source-2.4.25
>   kernel-source-2.4.26
> 
>   kernel-image-2.6.11-alpha
>   kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64
>   kernel-image-2.6.11-i386
>   kernel-image-2.6.11-ia64
> 
>   kernel-patch-2.6.10-hppa
> 
>   kernel-latest-2.6-amd64
> 
>   fai-kernels (request from Holger Levsen)
> 
>   mol-modules-2.6.11

I just uploaded mol-modules-2.6.12, so once they pass NEW, mol-modules-2.6.12
can go indeed.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: