Bug#321372: marked as done (Installation Report)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:05:39 +0200
with message-id <200508052105.40162.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#321372: Installation Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 04:50:12 +0000
>From unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com Thu Aug 04 21:50:12 2005
Return-path: <unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com>
Received: from bay102-dav13.bay102.hotmail.com (hotmail.com) [64.4.61.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E0u9s-0002dg-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:50:12 -0700
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:49:41 -0700
Message-ID: <[🔎] BAY102-DAV1326B2FD7742D41C1FFE19A9C70@phx.gbl>
Received: from 64.4.61.200 by BAY102-DAV13.phx.gbl with DAV;
Fri, 05 Aug 2005 04:49:41 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [64.4.61.200]
X-Originating-Email: [unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com]
X-Sender: unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com
From: "Tacvek" <unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Installation Report
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 00:49:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2005 04:49:41.0713 (UTC) FILETIME=[17AB6C10:01C59979]
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,
HAS_PACKAGE,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso
Method: Boot from disc
Machine: VMWare 4.5.2 build 8848 on Windows XP SP2 host
Memory: VMware gave guest 160 MB simulated ram.
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
In this section i have placed comments on overall installation despite that
fact that the cmments thoughs and suggestions really are ment for several
different groups.
I have tested this. It works nice. I ran installation in default, menu, and
expert modes. Install was clean and worked well. *Much* better than old
installation system.
Post reboot installation works but it would be nice if it would ask all
debconf questions of the default debconf priority. (I always
'dpkg-reconfigure -a' to get a chance to answer the low-level questions
[Like the installing man setuid is never offered in base-config, so users
will not see it until they update man or run dpkg-reconfigure] after I
install.)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321372-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 19:05:19 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Fri Aug 05 12:05:19 2005
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from smtp-out1.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.176]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E17VO-0001bQ-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 12:05:19 -0700
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
by smtp-out1.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1E17VO-0006Gc-3b
for <321372-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 21:05:18 +0200
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: 321372-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#321372: Installation Report
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:05:39 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <[🔎] BAY102-DAV1326B2FD7742D41C1FFE19A9C70@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] BAY102-DAV1326B2FD7742D41C1FFE19A9C70@phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200508052105.40162.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 321372-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Friday 05 August 2005 06:49, Tacvek wrote:
> I have tested this. It works nice. I ran installation in default, menu,
> and expert modes. Install was clean and worked well. *Much* better than
> old installation system.
As the installation was successful and some questions have already been
answered, I'm closing this report.
Thanks for submitting it.
Cheers,
FJP
Reply to: