[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gtk graphical installer: call for help



> Tonight I'll check if it has to be fixed to
> be usable with the latest gdk-directfb sources.

I have built the udeb for gtk+ with directfb backend.
I did not pay attention to many details and the build process
complains about various things.
Here's the set of changes I applied to obtain the udeb (via 
"dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d"). It'll be possible to
download the results asap.

--- debian_orig/rules   2005-08-05 00:08:42.732745368 +0200
+++ debian_new/rules  2005-08-05 00:14:33.971348984 +0200
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@

 configure.in.udeb: configure.in
        dh_testdir
+       sh sh autogen.sh --with-gdktarget=directfb
+       make distclean
        sed -e s/^GTK_BINARY_VERSION=.*GTK_MINOR_VERSION/\&-udeb/ configure.in > configure.in.udeb

--- debian_orig/libgtk+2.0-directfb-udeb-dev.install    2005-08-05 00:08:42.732745368 +0200
+++ debian_new/libgtk+2.0-directfb-udeb-dev.install   2005-08-05
00:07:40.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 usr/lib/libgdk-directfb*.so.*
 usr/lib/libgtk-directfb*.so.*
 usr/lib/udeblib
-usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.0-udeb.0
+usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0

--- debian_orig/libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb.install       2005-08-05 00:08:42.739744304 +0200
+++ debian_new/libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb.install      2005-08-05
00:07:40.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 usr/lib/*.so.*
-usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.0-udeb.0/immodules/*.so
-usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.0-udeb.0/loaders/*.so
+usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/*.so
+usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/*.so 
+usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/*.so

--- debian_orig/changelog       2005-08-05 00:08:42.650757832 +0200
+++ debian_nouvo/changelog      2005-08-05 00:07:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+gtk+2.0-directfb (2.7.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Unofficial version based on gtk+2.7.2 and gdk-directfb (20050804)
+
+ -- Davide Viti <zinosat@tiscali.it>  Thu,  4 Aug 2005 19:02:28 +0200
+
 gtk+2.0-directfb (2.0.9-5) unstable; urgency=low

   * Add amd64 architecture. Closes: #249391.


Ciao,
Davide

PS: improvements are welcome



Reply to: