linux-kernel-di udebs [Was: Re: 2.6.12 upload]
- To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, Frans Pop <fjp@debian.org>
- Subject: linux-kernel-di udebs [Was: Re: 2.6.12 upload]
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:18:28 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 878xzqrjjf.fsf_-_@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- In-reply-to: <20050728152102.GA24695@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> (Bastian Blank's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:21:02 +0200")
- References: <87vf345y48.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20050726050404.GB16302@verge.net.au> <87ack9vgur.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20050726142513.GA7681@verge.net.au> <87mzo9tu3a.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20050727020238.GB31217@verge.net.au> <87ll3ssaku.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20050727125910.GA23135@verge.net.au> <87wtncq736.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20050728074900.GK19999@verge.net.au> <20050728152102.GA24695@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:49:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>> I tend to aggree, though I believe Franz Pop, or perhaps some of the
>> other d-i team members have reason for keeping these images separate.
>> Perhaps they could reiterate them here.
>
> Mostly two reasons:
> - Changes in the d-i packages don't trigger a complete rebuild.
> - There are more then 200 different binary packages.
>
> Bastian
At the start changes have been common and modules have been added or
removed or packages been split or joined.
But hasn't that settled down now? Aren't the linux-kernel-di udebs
consistent enough to be handled by kernel-source uploads?
I've CCed debian-boot to get a broader opinion.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: