Bug#312316: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT)
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:53:07 +0200
with message-id <20050607165307.GE7220@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug#312316: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 10:52:27 +0000
>From Gregor.Scharf@hochtaunus-kliniken.de Tue Jun 07 03:52:27 2005
Return-path: <Gregor.Scharf@hochtaunus-kliniken.de>
Received: from mail.hochtaunuskreis.net [217.24.13.147]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dfbh5-0000TO-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:52:27 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.hochtaunuskreis.net (htk.net mail-server) with ESMTP id 10FADBC591
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:34:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.hochtaunuskreis.net (htk.net mail-server, from userid 65534)
id 9FB72BC75F; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:34:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hochtaunus-kliniken.de (unknown [192.168.132.252])
by mail.hochtaunuskreis.net (htk.net mail-server) with ESMTP id C926ABC75F
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:34:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bhos076.bhodom1.lokal ([172.16.8.76])
by krankenhaus.lokal (bhos202)
(MDaemon.Standard.v7.1.2.R)
with ESMTP id md50000024279.msg
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:52:21 +0100
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: INSTALL REPORT
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:52:16 +0100
Message-ID: <[🔎] 736EF97B8F7C9245A9CC72B1BF353B984E2335@bhos076.bhodom1.lokal>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: INSTALL REPORT
Thread-Index: AcVrV1liU98f2GWjS0SsovoOx4rZ4g==
From: "Scharf, Gregor" <Gregor.Scharf@hochtaunus-kliniken.de>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-MDRemoteIP: 172.16.8.76
X-Return-Path: Gregor.Scharf@hochtaunus-kliniken.de
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-MDAV-Processed: bhos202, Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:52:22 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 6.6.2005 main ftp server
uname -a: Linux BHOS062 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Mon May 16 16:47:51 JST 2005 =
i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Di Jun 7 10:30:00 CEST 2005
Method...
Boot parameter: linux netcfg/disable_dhcp=3Dtrue
What did you boot off? CD 1
If network install, from where? [ ]
Proxied? [ ]
Machine: Compaq Proliant 400
Processor: Intel Pentium III 500 MHz
Memory: 2 x 64 MB SD-RAM
Root Device: SCSI with 10 GB
Root Size/partition table: Dunno, the installer did it :)
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host =
bridge (rev 03)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP =
bridge (rev 03)
0000:00:0d.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21152 =
(rev 03)
0000:00:14.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
0000:00:14.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
0000:00:14.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev =
01)
0000:00:14.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
0000:02:04.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c895 =
(rev 02)
0000:02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro =
100] (rev 05)
0000:02:06.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC =
215IIC [Mach64 GT IIC] (rev 7a)
0000:02:07.0 System peripheral: Compaq Computer Corporation Advanced =
System Management Controller
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 03)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 03)
0000:00:0d.0 0604: 1011:0024 (rev 03)
0000:00:14.0 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 02)
0000:00:14.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01)
0000:00:14.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01)
0000:00:14.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02)
0000:02:04.0 0100: 1000:000c (rev 02)
0000:02:05.0 0200: 8086:1229 (rev 05)
0000:02:06.0 0300: 1002:4756 (rev 7a)
0000:02:07.0 0880: 0e11:a0f0
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try =
it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
The installer detected my scsi card and hdd without any boot command! =
Respect :-)
WHY didnt ask the installer to choose between static ip and dhcp without =
any boot command ?
Apache2 ownz cause it comes with ssl :D
HOW did i search with find? It seems a litte bit difficult! :(
Install logs and other status info is available in =
/var/log/debian-installer/.
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to submit@bugs.debian.org.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 312316-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 17:11:39 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Tue Jun 07 10:11:39 2005
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from perrier.eu.org (kheops.perrier.eu.org) [81.56.227.253]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dfhc2-0003ru-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:11:39 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by kheops.perrier.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981DE4F8A3;
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:11:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kheops.perrier.eu.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 13465-07; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:11:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3])
by kheops.perrier.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EA74F891;
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:11:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
id 2EC6C2323D; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:53:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:53:07 +0200
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: "Scharf, Gregor" <Gregor.Scharf@hochtaunus-kliniken.de>,
312316-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#312316: INSTALL REPORT
Message-ID: <20050607165307.GE7220@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <[🔎] 736EF97B8F7C9245A9CC72B1BF353B984E2335@bhos076.bhodom1.lokal>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 736EF97B8F7C9245A9CC72B1BF353B984E2335@bhos076.bhodom1.lokal>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org
Delivered-To: 312316-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
> WHY didnt ask the installer to choose between static ip and dhcp without any boot command ?
Design choice. It is part of the minimum questions choice. The
question you're talking about is available at medium priority ("linux
DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium" at the boot prompt)
Given that your installation was a complete success, I do as
usual with reports for successful installations: I close the bug..:-)
This does not of course mean you weren't right to report. Knowing the
installations are correct is important for the d-i team.
Many thanks for your time testing the Debian Installer and reporting
your results. Have fun with your new Debian system!
Reply to: