Re: Sources vs udeb mismatch in sarge
(still not subscribed)
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:24:56PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Are there otherwise issues with any of those 9 source packages w.r.t.
> > udeb's getting synced to what already happened due to the source
> > packages being let into sarge? If so, those will need to be fixed.
> > - util-linux: 2.12-10 | 2.12p-4
> Rather more changes than I'm comfortable with, however we do only use
> fdisk from it, which is only used non-manually on an arch or two by
Currently this package (the udeb fdisk-udeb) is together with glibc
(which was decided to leave as-is) the only one out-of-sync. I assume
that at this stage, this should be left like it is now? On sarge r1
rebuild of the installer, this new version *will* get introduced anyway
though, so it still is important to know that it doesn't break anything,
or it'll be needed to be fixed later.
What to do? Ship with the 2.12-10 udeb in sarge, and cross fingers for
the 2.12p-4[.x] version for sarge r1?
 Well, if there's no security update, one could decide to leave it
the same also for point releases though
Jeroen van Wolffelaar