[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#308241: marked as done (installation-reports)



Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 17:40:41 +0200
with message-id <20050521154041.GB26859@gpm.stappers.nl>
and subject line closing a duplicate
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 23:29:22 +0000
>From stappers@stappers.nl Sun May 08 16:29:22 2005
Return-path: <stappers@stappers.nl>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DUvD7-0002MD-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 16:29:22 -0700
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BF499794A0; Mon,  9 May 2005 01:24:15 +0200 (CEST)
Resent-From: stappers@stappers.nl
Resent-Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 01:24:15 +0200
Resent-Message-ID: <20050508232415.GI2334@gpm.stappers.nl>
Resent-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Original-To: stappers@localhost
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BF0794A0
	for <stappers@localhost>; Sun,  8 May 2005 01:31:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from u2.gpm.stappers.nl [81.4.92.35]
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
	for stappers@localhost (multi-drop); Sun, 08 May 2005 01:31:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 24632 invoked from network); 7 May 2005 23:34:08 -0000
Received: from murphy.debian.org (146.82.138.6)
  by servers.by.d-server.nl with SMTP; 7 May 2005 23:34:08 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
	id 562722E0CA; Sat,  7 May 2005 18:34:04 -0500 (CDT)
Old-Return-Path: <michel@mitch-it.com>
X-Original-To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Received: from sarge (mitnick.bitbucket.nl [80.126.80.171])
	by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9692E04B
	for <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>; Sat,  7 May 2005 18:11:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from toshwlan.mitch-it.nl (toshwlan.mitch-it.nl [10.0.0.20])
	by sarge (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6E03ADF3
	for <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>; Sun,  8 May 2005 01:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: installation-reports
From: Michel van der Klei <michel@mitch-it.com>
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 01:11:48 +0200
Message-Id: <1115507509.2069.25.camel@tosh.mitch-it.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-mitch-it-debian-site-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-mitch-it-debian-site-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted),
	SpamAssassin (score=-5.859, required 3, autolearn=not spam,
	ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, AWL 0.04, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-MailScanner-From: michel@mitch-it.com
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-03-31_01
X-Rc-Virus: 2005-02-17_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-03-31_01
Resent-Message-ID: <55ZNe.A.ZOD.sBVfCB@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-boot@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/86466
X-Loop: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-boot.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sat,  7 May 2005 18:34:04 -0500 (CDT)
X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address debian-boot@lists.debian.org didn't match any local name
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/
uname -a: nothing cause it got stuck in the installer
Date: May 6st
Method: Network install

Machine: Dell PowerEdge SC 1420 
Processor: Xeon 2,8 HT
Memory: 512mb
Root Device: SCSI
Root Size/partition table: No HDD detected
Output of lspci and lspci -n:Not possible because of an install was not possible

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =
didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O] (manualy added the e1000 module, not detected)
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [E] (Failure on the scsi controller)
Detect hard drives:     [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]

Comments/Problems:

Changed various settings on the scsi controller, bios enabled/disabled raid enabled disabled etc,
all without success. Tried an install with a 2.6 kernel, no success. Manually added the needed 
modules (aic7xxx.0 and aacraid.o and tried aic79XXX aswell) without any success (with kernel 2.4 and 2.6)

Felt quitte desparated ;-) so i've installed the machine with the iso from the open-sourcelab
which comes with the Red Hat driver for this controller. This worked out fine but this is not
the way to go since this iso comes with a static kernel.This iso can be found on:
http://wiki.osuosl.org/display/LNX/Debian+on+Dell+Servers but ... it's woody based.

Advantage of the installation is that i can provide you with the out put of lspci and lspci -n
see below.

I'm gonna try to do some work with the sources form the adaptec site and udeb, but maybe there
are some folks over here who had this problem before ... so if so i'll be very gratefull.

output lspci and lspci -n

fs:~# lspci
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. Server Memory Controller Hub (rev 09)
0000:00:00.1 ff00: Intel Corp. Memory Controller Hub Error Reporting Register (rev 09)
0000:00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. Memory Controller Hub PCI Express Port A0 (rev 09)
0000:00:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. Memory Controller Hub PCI Express Port A1 (rev 09)
0000:00:04.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. Memory Controller Hub PCI Express Port B0 (rev 09)
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev c2)
0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) Ultra ATA 100 Storage Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB (ICH5) Serial ATA 150 Storage Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) SMBus Controller (rev 02)
0000:01:00.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. PCI Bridge Hub A
0000:01:00.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. PCI Bridge Hub B
0000:02:0c.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
0000:03:0c.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec ASC-39320(B) U320 w/HostRAID (rev 10)
0000:03:0c.1 RAID bus controller: Adaptec ASC-39320(B) U320 w/HostRAID (rev 10)
0000:03:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82545GM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 04)

fs:~# lspci -n
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:3590 (rev 09)
0000:00:00.1 ff00: 8086:3591 (rev 09)
0000:00:02.0 0604: 8086:3595 (rev 09)
0000:00:03.0 0604: 8086:3596 (rev 09)
0000:00:04.0 0604: 8086:3597 (rev 09)
0000:00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:24d2 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:24d4 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:24d7 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.3 0c03: 8086:24de (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:24dd (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev c2)
0000:00:1f.0 0601: 8086:24d0 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 0101: 8086:24db (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.2 0101: 8086:24d1 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:24d3 (rev 02)
0000:01:00.0 0604: 8086:0329
0000:01:00.2 0604: 8086:032a
0000:02:0c.0 0300: 1002:474f (rev 27)
0000:03:0c.0 0104: 9005:8095 (rev 10)
0000:03:0c.1 0104: 9005:8095 (rev 10)
0000:03:0e.0 0200: 8086:1026 (rev 04)
fs:~#  

Kind Regards,

Michel van der Klei





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308241-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 15:46:41 +0000
>From stappers@stappers.nl Sat May 21 08:46:41 2005
Return-path: <stappers@stappers.nl>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DZWBU-0002g5-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 08:46:41 -0700
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 90291794A0; Sat, 21 May 2005 17:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 17:40:41 +0200
To: 308241-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing a duplicate
Message-ID: <20050521154041.GB26859@gpm.stappers.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: 308241-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline


Bugreport #309123 is about the same computer,
but that one has a nicer title.

Hence closing this duplicate.


Cheers
Geert Stappers


--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCj1Z5OSINbgwa/7sRAkX9AKC3yjBKPmRg9VdFZzLiSpooQ5oY6gCfaTsF
cXTsvT/+dhKIDaotmC4+CgY=
=Yq9k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--



Reply to: