[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Help



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Clive Menzies wrote:
| On (20/04/05 19:18), Marcell Metzner wrote:
|
|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>Hello,
|>~From two weeks now I'm working on a way to create RAID device which must
|>be used for the installation.
|>Please
|>can you point me how to do this...
|>I'm really tired with this:(
|
| Hi Marcel
|
| You need to tell us a bit more about your setup and what you've tried.
| It took me over a week to get a RAID1 setup installed on a recycled
| server recently and 90% of the problem was down to a dodgy Promise
| FatsTrak100 Ultra ATA controller.  Once I switched the drives to the
| onboard IDE controller, all was sweet;)
|
| There are also issues relating to different kernels and SATA drives.
|
| So give us some info ....... meanwhile, here are some links:
|
|
| Regards
|
| Clive
|
| PS ..... and a more specific subject line would get better response  ;)
|

Software RAID (RAID1) on different type of hardware. The only i can
specify about the hardware is that we don't use SATA discs on this
machines. I had the problems Sascha Wintz mentioned about partman(it can
not partition more then one disk) but I solve them by just doing the
partitioning of the next HDDs on post install level using the
base-config base-config/late_command.

The problem is that I wish to create the RAID on preinstall level and to
make the installer install the system over the RAID wich will be mounted
as usual at /target.

I allready found a way to partition the disk with sfdisk on preinstall
base and to create the RAID but the installer do not continue after I
comment the lins in the preseed conserning the partitioning(partman).

Regards
	M.Marinov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCZuaw3Yxvcd1IerIRArcwAKCY21SDDqczDW+b+j6wNggWMh3HvQCcCNjP
fZrXaZpUlzWpH0xxysMPf2Q=
=Csvq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: