On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 07:16:09AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Actually, I think that it is ata_piix. I am attaching my working > > 2.6.11.5 kernel config and the output of lsmod. I am not using an > > initrd image. However, if I modprobe ata_piix and sd_mod, the > > installer still does not find the hard drive. I don't find any > > entries in /dev/scsi either. It does not help to modprobe all of the > > other sata_* modules either. > > > So, loading ata_piix should be the Right Way for discover when finding > your SATA chipset but what you say it that this is not enough with the > D-I kernel, right ? > > So, this problem is dual: > > -discover needs to load the correct module : easy to fix in pci.lst I've added the missing information to pci.lst. > > -the kernel module must properly handle your hardware : not easy to > fix if this fails with the current 2.6.8-2 kernel we have in D-I > > For everyone reading this : is this the correct conclusion? I think this conculsion is correct. Horm: Is there any need to reassign this bug to the kernel (if yes which package?)? The only problem reported in this bug not yet solved is the second network card: 0000:04:02.0 0280: 8086:4224 (rev 05) 0000:04:02.0 Network controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 4224 (rev 05) Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
Attachment:
pgpGKtnsPZAUe.pgp
Description: PGP signature