28.03.2005 о 00:21 +0200 Frans Pop написав(-ла): > > Is it possible that the installer establishes a signal handler which > > is then inherited by the processes started from the installer, and > > thus the SIGTERM sent by s-s-d to exim is caught by that handler > > instead of getting through to exim? > > Could well be. /usr/sbin/base-config has: > > <snip> > if [ "$NEW" ]; then > # Trap most signals because a ctrl-c killing base-config > # in the middle of the second stage install would be bad. > trap "" HUP INT QUIT TERM > > [some lines not included] > else > # Running again on an existing install. Just trap ctrl-c, and > # cleanly exit. > trap cleanup INT > fi > </snip> > Here is part of diff of contents of /proc/$PID/status files for exim run form command line and from base-config: 24c24 < SigIgn: 0000000000001000 --- > SigIgn: 0000000000005006 Those new ignored signals are INT (2+1), QUIT (3+1) and TERM (14+1). -- Eugeniy Meshcheryakov Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University Information and Computing Centre http://icc.univ.kiev.ua
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature