[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#261824: time's up

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:54:14AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> I did the "new upstream", so I can tell you that it was only a couple of
> lines of code changes, and they were tested well before being put into the
> silo repo.

> I don't think it needs extensive testing.

It seems that this version of silo ended up being used to build the CDs for
d-i RC3 (even though the .deb *on* the CDs came from testing), so it's
already getting more extensive testing than I think we bargained for.  It
also seems to be holding up well under it, so I'm going ahead and approving
1.4.9-1 for testing, barring the appearance of any last-minute RC bugs.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:34:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:30:55AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Can the silo I just uploaded go into testing atleast? It does fix some
> > > bugs. In fact, it may fix some of the rc silo bugs, but I need testing
> > > with it to make sure (didn't want to claim the bugs were fixed without
> > > testing by others first).
> > 
> > It fixes the RC build-dependency bug, so it should probably go in; but given
> > that it's a new upstream version, it should get a fair measure of testing
> > first -- at least to verify it hasn't caused any major regressions, whether
> > or not it fixes the outstanding bugs.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -- 
> > Steve Langasek
> > postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: