On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 17:36 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:23:21PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: [...] > > > I won't blame joeyh for laughing in our face (or spitting in it) if we > > can't commit to having these other archs in shape quickly. In fact; it > > seems kinda silly to engage debian-boot w/o having all archs in sid as > > evidence of its viability. > > Knowing that the sparc kernels are somewhat time-starved, I'm not surprised > that there are no 2.6.10 images in the archive for this arch. If 2.6.10 is > something we should be shooting for, then having this meeting may be what's > needed to help the sparc porters focus their efforts most effectively. The > same may be true for powerpc? > As I seem to have the sexiest sparc hardware around, I can certainly make getting a usable environment for joshk and traveller a priority. -- Andres Salomon <dilinger@voxel.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part