Bug#291163: [powerpc][20050117] Flawless install on Dual G5 Apple PowerMac7,3
Package: installation-reports
This is purely for the record - no problems to report on a
straightforward installation. Until this daily build one thing or the
other always broke ;-)
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Netinst daily build 20050117
uname -a: Linux test 2.6.8-power4 #1 Sat Jan 8 18:52:26 CET 2005 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: Jan 18 1230 PST
Method: Boot of CD with install-power4 kernel
Machine: Dual Apple G5 PowerMac7,3
Processor: 970FX 2Ghz
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: 160G SATA Drive, /dev/sda (In d-i i think /dev/discs/disc0)
Boot partition at /dev/sda2 (800k)
Swap partition at /dev/sda3 (1G)
Linux on a single test partition at /dev/sda7 (ext3) (4G)
MacOS X on /dev/sda5 (HFS+)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
Flawless install!
d-i chosen single processor power4 kernel reports
processor : 0
cpu : PPC970FX
clock : 2000MHz
revision : 3.0 (pvr 003c 0300)
bogomips : 1196.03
machine : PowerMac7,3
motherboard : PowerMac7,3 MacRISC4 Power Macintosh
detected as : 336 (PowerMac G5)
pmac flags : 00000000
L2 cache : 512K unified
memory : 0MB
pmac-generation : NewWorld
Installed kernel-image-2.6.8-power4-smp and rebooted
processor : 0
cpu : PPC970FX
clock : 2000MHz
revision : 3.0 (pvr 003c 0300)
bogomips : 1331.20
processor : 1
cpu : PPC970FX
clock : 2000MHz
revision : 3.0 (pvr 003c 0300)
bogomips : 1331.20
total bogomips : 2662.40
machine : PowerMac7,3
motherboard : PowerMac7,3 MacRISC4 Power Macintosh
detected as : 336 (PowerMac G5)
pmac flags : 00000000
L2 cache : 512K unified
memory : 0MB
pmac-generation : NewWorld
Thermal controls work fine at all times; all fans are quiet :-)
Reply to: