Bug#289261: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:52:33 +0100
with message-id <20050108065232.GC7991@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug#289261: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2005 02:50:46 +0000
>From dbrick@kom.net Fri Jan 07 18:50:46 2005
Return-path: <dbrick@kom.net>
Received: from linus.ncplus.net [64.40.40.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cn6gg-0008Or-00; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:50:46 -0800
Received: from ronin.kallback.com.kom.net (ronin.kallback.com [66.54.140.9])
by linus.ncplus.net (8.12.8/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j082ojdY027844
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:50:45 -0800
Message-ID: <[🔎] 16863.19077.865957.273858@ronin.kallback.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:50:45 -0800
From: Douglas Brick <dbrick@kom.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: INSTALL REPORT
In-Reply-To: <handler.x.B.110515121018003.nonumnosub@bugs.debian.org>
References: <16863.17641.631064.776140@ronin.kallback.com>
<handler.x.B.110515121018003.nonumnosub@bugs.debian.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.16 under Emacs 21.2.1
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 6 Jan 2005 www.debian.org
uname -a: Linux newtmp 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Wed Dec 1 19:43:08 JST 2004
i586 GNU/Linux
Date: 6 Jan 2005 16:30 PST
Method: network install from netinst cd;
ftp://debian.oregonstate.edu/; nonproxied
Machine: older i86 type
Processor: 200Mhz Intel
Memory: 80MB
Root Device: /dev/hda1
Root default partion, all disk on one partion
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430FX - 82437FX TSC [Triton I] (rev 02)
0000:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371FB PIIX ISA [Triton I] (rev 02)
0000:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371FB PIIX IDE [Triton I] (rev 02)
0000:00:11.0 VGA compatible controller: Cirrus Logic GD 5430/40 [Alpine] (rev 47)
0000:00:14.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 64)
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:122d (rev 02)
0000:00:07.0 0601: 8086:122e (rev 02)
0000:00:07.1 0101: 8086:1230 (rev 02)
0000:00:11.0 0300: 1013:00a0 (rev 47)
0000:00:14.0 0200: 10b7:9055 (rev 64)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [E]
Comments/Problems: There was some problem with the second part of the
install, after the first reboot, but I wasn't there to see exactly
what happened, somehow it rebooted itself and was starting to redo the
2ndary install again. I'm guessing there's some intermittent problem
with the hardware.
I've been putting off installing Debian for a year or so now, but the
old Unix versions I'd been using were becoming untenable. I tried
fedora, and rather liked it, but the most recent version wouldn't
install on some of the older and some of the newer machines. It's too
early to tell for sure, but just watching the Debian install on 2
machines now, I'm really impressed. Thanks much for the good work.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289261-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2005 06:55:50 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Fri Jan 07 22:55:50 2005
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from perrier.eu.org (kheops.perrier.eu.org) [81.56.227.253]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CnAVp-0002VD-00; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:55:50 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by kheops.perrier.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DC08A4F984; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:55:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kheops.perrier.eu.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 15989-07; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:55:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3])
by kheops.perrier.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 608F54F959; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:55:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
id 56E3D2328D; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:52:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:52:33 +0100
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Douglas Brick <dbrick@kom.net>, 289261-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#289261: INSTALL REPORT
Message-ID: <20050108065232.GC7991@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <16863.17641.631064.776140@ronin.kallback.com> <handler.x.B.110515121018003.nonumnosub@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 16863.19077.865957.273858@ronin.kallback.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 16863.19077.865957.273858@ronin.kallback.com>
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-pot_a_miel: honeypot@kheops.frmug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org
Delivered-To: 289261-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
> I've been putting off installing Debian for a year or so now, but the
> old Unix versions I'd been using were becoming untenable. I tried
> fedora, and rather liked it, but the most recent version wouldn't
> install on some of the older and some of the newer machines. It's too
> early to tell for sure, but just watching the Debian install on 2
> machines now, I'm really impressed. Thanks much for the good work.
Given that this install report is a complete success report, I do as
usual with successful install report : I close the bug..:-)
This does not of course mean you weren't right to report. Knowing the
installations are correct is important for the d-i team.
Many thanks for yourtime testing the Debian Installer and reporting
your results. Have fun with your new Debian system!
Reply to: