[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#257027: marked as done (Debconf priority is 'Low' at second-stage)



Your message dated Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:02:02 -0400
with message-id <E1Bg5so-0004qp-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#257027: fixed in prebaseconfig 0.67
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 16:16:52 +0000
>From marga@marga.com.ar Wed Jun 30 09:16:52 2004
Return-path: <marga@marga.com.ar>
Received: from (erwin.amadeus) [200.115.206.168] (foobar)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BfhlU-0007QA-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:16:52 -0700
Received: from ulises.amadeus
	([192.168.21.15] helo=ulises.home ident=mail)
	by erwin.amadeus with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BfhlS-0007RI-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:16:50 -0300
Received: from marga by ulises.home with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BfhlC-00064D-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:16:34 -0300
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:16:34 -0300
From: Margarita Manterola <marga@marga.com.ar>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Debconf priority is 'Low' at second-stage
Message-ID: <20040630161634.GA23297@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Margarita Manterola <marga@ulises>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: prebaseconfig
Severity: important

With the latest floppy images, I installed an i386 machine.  Everything
went smooth as usual.  The only thing unusual I did was to do some
special partitioning, to leave space for a dual-boot system.

When rebooting into second stage, debconf priority had suddenly turned
to low.

On analysis, we found that questions.dat contained no value for debconf
priority, while templates.dat contained the correct default.

We talked about this on IRC and decided that the problem is in
prebaseconfig, since there was a piece of code that made sure that
debconf priority was set in the file questions.dat and it seems not to
be working anymore.

The files (questions.dat and templates.dat) are available on request.

Hope someone can fix this :)

-- 
 Bezitos,
     Maggie.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 257027-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2004 18:08:04 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Thu Jul 01 11:08:04 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bg5ye-0008IK-00; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:08:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bg5so-0004qp-00; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:02:02 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 257027-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#257027: fixed in prebaseconfig 0.67
Message-Id: <E1Bg5so-0004qp-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:02:02 -0400
Delivered-To: 257027-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: prebaseconfig
Source-Version: 0.67

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prebaseconfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

prebaseconfig_0.67.dsc
  to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.67.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.67.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.67.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.67_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.67_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 257027@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> (supplier of updated prebaseconfig package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  1 Jul 2004 13:34:52 -0400
Source: prebaseconfig
Binary: prebaseconfig
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.67
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description: 
 prebaseconfig - Finish the installation and reboot (udeb)
Closes: 257027
Changes: 
 prebaseconfig (0.67) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Joey Hess
     - Grep for processes matching "debconf -o", which is how rootskel 0.77
       changed to running it. Closes: #257027
Files: 
 6b1956ec2cd0a0569e3cdf71f913d11d 741 debian-installer required prebaseconfig_0.67.dsc
 778a825a454f762ca5b91f8b5ecda5f7 36310 debian-installer required prebaseconfig_0.67.tar.gz
 ecd00450d32dc246ece92011b09a0cdb 15296 debian-installer required prebaseconfig_0.67_all.udeb
package-type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA5E1T2tp5zXiKP0wRAmrkAKDM2ftNI8/48gWryh4NUdsiOUjQZgCgqDZV
UcgT6MOpsX2LvcLApb28i4E=
=fkN/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: