[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#235717: marked as done (Installation report (i386 - Beta 2))



Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:52:32 +0100
with message-id <200403040052.32841.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Installation report (i386 - Beta 2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 02:10:31 +0000
>From fjp@fjpop.homelinux.net Mon Mar 01 18:10:30 2004
Return-path: <fjp@fjpop.homelinux.net>
Received: from ha-smtp0.tiscali.nl [195.241.76.186] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AxzMc-00041A-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:10:30 -0800
Received: from sauron.fjphome.nl (195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl [195.240.184.66])
	by ha-smtp0.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566782E7230
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 23:35:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Frans Pop <fjp@fjpop.homelinux.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Installation report (i386 - Beta 2)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 23:35:29 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Reply-To: aragorn@tiscali.nl
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200403012335.29714.fjp@fjpop.homelinux.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

I have been a Debian user since about 5 years.
I currently have a home network consisting of 3 i386 boxes (2 servers, 1 desktop)
and used the desktop for the installation test. Because I got confused the first
few times and was not satisfied with the result, I did the installation 3 times.

Debian-installer-version: Beta 2 (i386 100MB CD image)
uname -a: Linux sauron 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Feb 29 15:30
Method: Boot from Debian Installer CD (in hdc); additional packages from internet (http)

Machine: NEC Direction
Processor: Pentium III (Coppermine)
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: I installed spare IDE disk as hdb and used that for install

Root Size/partition table:  
hda: QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 20 (unused for this install)
hdb: Maxtor 90430D3
hdc: Hewlett-Packard CD-Writer Plus 8100
hdd: PIONEER DVD-ROM DVD-114

Disk /dev/hdb: 4311 MB, 4311982080 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 524 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start  End   Blocks   Id  System      Mounted as
/dev/hdb1           1  135  1084356    b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hdb2         136  524  3124642+   5  Extended
/dev/hdb5         136  176   329301    6  FAT16
/dev/hdb6         177  480  2441848+  83  Linux       /
/dev/hdb7         481  500   160618+  83  Linux       /home
/dev/hdb8         501  524   192748+  82  Linux swap  swap

Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo PRO133x] (rev c4)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo MVP3/Pro133x AGP]
00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 22)
00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10)
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:07.4 SMBus: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30)
00:0e.0 Network controller: Eicon Technology Corporation Diva 2.01 S/T PCI (rev 01)
00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 43)
00:11.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 07)
00:11.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev 07)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF/SG AGP


Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
Installation in general went fine; important hardware was all
recognized and working after install.

*** Network configuration and DHCP ***
- I think static network configuration should _always_ be an option even if
  DHCP is available (eg. for servers).
- Dynamic DNS is currently not supported when DHCP is used; I had to manually add
  'send hostname "<hostname>";' to dhclient.conf in order to get the box recognized
  by my DNS-servers.

*** CD/DVD recognition ***
There is somthing funny with how the two CD drives are handled.
- System was booted of hdc. Installation also ran from hdc.
- In post-install when adding apt-sources I had to switch the installation CD from
  hdc to hdd when apt-cdrom scans to add the CD.
- When installing packages I had to switch the installation CD back to hdc.

It looks like discover sometimes switches hdc and hdd between /dev/cdrom0
and /dev/cdrom1. I confirmed this by checking /dev/cd* after installation
and after later reboots.

After installation I had _3_ directories created in / (cdrom, cdrom0, cdrom1),
but there was no default entry for /dev/hdd (to /cdrom1?) in /etc/fstab.

Both my HP CD-RW and Pioneer DVD were installed as ide-cd; the HP CD-RW should
be ide-scsi to support CD-writing. Should the installer handle this?

I changed the CD-RW manually (using /etc/modutils/) and now have:
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           11 Mar  1 22:47 /dev/cdrom -> /dev/cdrom0
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root            8 Mar  1 22:47 /dev/cdrom0 -> /dev/hdd
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root            9 Mar  1 22:47 /dev/cdrom1 -> /dev/scd0

Maybe it would be better to have /dev/cdrom0 and /dev/cdrom1 in fstab instead of
/dev/hdc etc. This would also support an ide-scsi drive like above.

*** Usability ***
- I liked installing using the menu better then the 'fully automated' way.
  During the first two installations I got 'lost' several times; it is not
  always obvious how to skip a step (eg. partitioning).
- In the dialog for 'Partition a hard drive' there should be a text 'or choose
  Finish to use existing partitions'.
- The /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0 notation is very confusing for less
  experienced users. Where possible (e.g. selecting a disc for partitioning
  and lilo configuration) the notation used during 'Configure and mount
  partitions' should be used(IDE x Master/Slave Disc/Partition x).
- During lilo configuration there should be a selection list instead of having to
  manually edit (I wanted /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part6 which I chainload
  from lilo on hda; I got really stuck here the first time).
- Maybe there should be an option during installation to add the 'normal user' to
  selected groups (like audio, cdrom).
- There should be an indication during Configure and mount partitions which
  partition has been selected and will be mounted as swap.
- There is no progress information when the installer configures and mount
  partitions.
- Selection of apt sources should have a 'finish' option; now you can get stuck.

*** General remarks ***
I missed the following questions during post-install (questions I remember from
the installation procedure for Woody):
- Is system clock UTC or local?
- System does not have PCMCIA, should packages be removed?

Thanks for the good work!


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 235717-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2004 23:53:04 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Wed Mar 03 15:53:04 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AygAi-0005D3-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:53:04 -0800
Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp)
	by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AygAD-0002KN-00
	for <235717-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:52:33 +0100
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: 235717-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Installation report (i386 - Beta 2)
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:52:32 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200403040052.32841.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 235717-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Have tested installation with more recent version.
Will submit new report and repeat still relevant items there.

FJP



Reply to: