Falk Hueffner wrote: > This is the only partitioning scheme which in my opinion fits for > users who might go with whatever the default is: > > / Whole harddisk > swap none, but 512M swap file (independent of memory) I also wouldn't mind having this scheme available, although I think the current "simple" scheme (/, /home, /swap) is also useful. > Swap nowadays only serve to spill pages that haven't been accessed for > hours, or to slow down the system enough so you can kill processes > gone haywire; therefore, it is not performance critical and a swap > file will do just fine and is more flexible WRT resizing. Not true for many of our target architectures and systems. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature