Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> The following 55 packages was not installed by cdebootstrap, but
> installed by debootstrap:
As a check, I installed deborphan in the debootstrap chroot, and
looked at the output from 'deborphan -a', to find out which packages
in the chroot that nothing depend on. This is the complete list.
main/admin at
main/admin pciutils
main/base base-config
main/base fdutils
main/base gettext-base
main/base ipchains
main/base modconf
main/base pppconfig
main/base setserial
main/base slang1
main/base tasksel
main/devel gcc-3.2-base
main/doc info
main/doc manpages
main/editors ed
main/editors nano
main/editors nvi
main/mail exim4
main/net iptables
main/net pppoeconf
main/net telnet
main/utils cpio
main/utils syslinux
Of these, gcc-3.2-base is an obvious candidate for removal, and I've
submitted a request to BTS.
Why is slang1 installed? Why are both ipchains and iptables
installed? Why is gettext-base installed if nothing depend on it?
Why is syslinux installed at all? Why isn't mbr listed? Lot of
strange results here...
Reply to: