[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255104: why is this bug assigned to rootskel?



also sprach Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> [2004.12.17.2034 +0100]:
> I guess this bug is assigned to rootskel because it contains
> link_in_boot settings that are used for kernel installation.
> However, without a better description of the problem I'm at a loss
> to see how rootskel can fix it, or why it was reassigned to here
> from the kernel.

There is no problem, merely a cosmetical issue. Also, it has been
discussed on d-b and I remember the result to be: there are more
important things to be done right now.

Why I assigned this to rootskel, I do not know. I seem to remember
that I was advised to do so on #debian-boot. However, that was half
a year ago...

I would still love to see kernel images installed to /boot by
default. However, I realise that this won't be easy...

-- 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: