[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#284657: marked as done (Package: installation-reports - INSTALL REPORT - RC2 Success (i386, nforce2))



Your message dated Wed, 8 Dec 2004 07:24:25 +0100
with message-id <20041208062425.GF5720@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug#284657: Package: installation-reports - INSTALL REPORT - RC2 Success (i386, nforce2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2004 19:46:12 +0000
>From debianiquetamere@katamail.com Tue Dec 07 11:46:12 2004
Return-path: <debianiquetamere@katamail.com>
Received: from hal-7.inet.it [213.92.5.33] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CblHo-0004Mh-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 11:46:12 -0800
Received: from ca-sqy-6-106.w80-8.abo.wanadoo.fr [::ffff:80.8.59.106] by hal-7.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.2.1-520
	id ::ffff:80.8.59.106+6cR5iLYk6jBa6; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 20:46:10 +0100
From: "debianiquetamere@katamail.com" <debianiquetamere@katamail.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-wmSenderIP: 80.8.59.106
Message-ID: <[🔎] 80.8.59.106.1378162815.1102448770@webmail.katamail.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@katamail.com
Subject: Package: installation-reports - INSTALL REPORT - RC2 Success (i386, nforce2)
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:46:10 +0000
X-Mailer: Katamail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT - RC2 Success (i386, nforce2)

Debian-installer-version: RC2 Full CD ISO#1 from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/weekly/i386/
uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 25 04:24:08 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 30/11/2004
Method: Booted from the CD#1, typed 'linux26 netcfg/disable_dhcp=true', full desktop install from the CD#1 (I only had this one), without using internet (because I have a PPPOE connection)
Machine: self-assembled
Processor: AMD duron 1400 mhz
Memory: 512 MB DDR
Root Device: IDE Seagate 40 GB Barracuda IV, master drive on IDE1 (Primary IDE connector)
Root Size/partition table:  Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 77545 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   */root  1         291      146632+  83  Linux
/dev/hda2             292        4166     1953000   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda3   /        4167        9979     2929752   83  Linux
/dev/hda4            9980       77545    34053264    f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5   /tmp     9980       10270      146632+  83  Linux
/dev/hda6   /var    10271       16083     2929720+  83  Linux
/dev/hda7   /home   16084       25771     4882720+  83  Linux
/dev/hda8   /opt    25772       31584     2929720+  83  Linux
/dev/hda9   /usr    31585       70336    19530976+  83  Linux
/dev/hda10/usr/local70337       77545     3633304+  83  Linux
All partitions: ext3
And a second drive I connected days later to mount windows partitions.

Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (different version?) (rev c1)
0000:00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 1 (rev c1)
0000:00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 4 (rev c1)
0000:00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 3 (rev c1)
0000:00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 2 (rev c1)
0000:00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 5 (rev c1)
0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 ISA Bridge (rev a4)
0000:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce2 SMBus (MCP) (rev a2)
0000:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
0000:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
0000:00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
0000:00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Ethernet Controller (rev a1)
0000:00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AC97 Audio Controler (MCP) (rev a1)
0000:00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 External PCI Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IDE (rev a2)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (rev c1)
0000:02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 04)

0000:00:00.0 0600: 10de:01e0 (rev c1)
0000:00:00.1 0500: 10de:01eb (rev c1)
0000:00:00.2 0500: 10de:01ee (rev c1)
0000:00:00.3 0500: 10de:01ed (rev c1)
0000:00:00.4 0500: 10de:01ec (rev c1)
0000:00:00.5 0500: 10de:01ef (rev c1)
0000:00:01.0 0601: 10de:0060 (rev a4)
0000:00:01.1 0c05: 10de:0064 (rev a2)
0000:00:02.0 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4)
0000:00:02.1 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4)
0000:00:02.2 0c03: 10de:0068 (rev a4)
0000:00:04.0 0200: 10de:0066 (rev a1)
0000:00:06.0 0401: 10de:006a (rev a1)
0000:00:08.0 0604: 10de:006c (rev a3)
0000:00:09.0 0101: 10de:0065 (rev a2)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 10de:01e8 (rev c1)
0000:02:00.0 0300: 102b:0525 (rev 04)


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [ ] I configured PPPOE later, in GNOME
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:
Successful install! Thank you very much for your fruitful hard work! :)
Now on to something completely different...
Between RC2 and perfection...
The installer asked me for my IP and other networking infos despite the boot option passed (netcfg/disable_dhcp=true); I felt blocked there but courageously managed to go to the menu, and chose the next option. :) During partitioning, after creating 3 main partitions, I looked for a way to create an extended partition, and after 10 minutes of unsuccessful trials I found out it was created automatically as I created a fourth partition.
The install then proceeded smoothly.
Post-install problems I had to solve myself (now everything is fine!):
- no sound ! I had to install alsa myself (I read sarge goes the 2.4 kernel + OSS way in the mailing-list). That would be nice if alsa was installed automatically with the 2.6 kernel. A total newbie wouldn't know about it and feel disappointed by the silence of debian.
- my old Sony 15 SFII monitor was not recognized as such (I tried and trusted the automatic way for monitor and mouse), and I lost many hours googling for a way to modify the settings of the monitor (first in XF86Config-4 to add '1024 768', then in /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers to add '-dpi 100' in :0 local@tty1 /usr/X11R6/bin/X -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp vt7)
The sound was of very bad quality; it took me hours of googling to find out that I had too much distortion because PCM volume was set to high (by me probably). Sound is still worse than in windows, but the sound card is different (AC97 now, Yamaha XG ymf744b in windows).
Why is apt-listbugs not installed by default? A couple of years ago I installed Woody and after 1 month of daily (I later learned monthly ones are wiser) upgrades (not from stable), my system was crashing in the middle of the boot sequence, and I never could solve this fatal problem. I went back to windows for 2 years.
You may write the name of a command to list the partition table (fdisk -l) in install-report.template/Root Size/partition table:. I lost a couple of minutes googgling for it. I shall never forgive you.
Go bubulle! Champagne pour tout le monde! Bonne fêtes à tous! ; )
Arigato! Grazie mille! Danke Schoen!

________________________________________________________________________
Cerchi un laboratorio fotografico aperto 24 ore su 24?
Stampa le tue foto digitali su Kataweb e le ricevi a domicilio in 48 ore.
http://www.kataweb.it/foto



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 284657-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2004 07:14:04 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Tue Dec 07 23:14:04 2004
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cbw1T-0004Tw-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:14:03 -0800
Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by onera.onera.fr  with ESMTP id iB87E1XU016556;
        Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:14:02 +0100 (MET)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
	id 309EB232A0; Wed,  8 Dec 2004 07:24:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 07:24:25 +0100
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: "debianiquetamere@katamail.com" <debianiquetamere@katamail.com>,
        284657-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#284657: Package: installation-reports - INSTALL REPORT - RC2 Success (i386, nforce2)
Message-ID: <20041208062425.GF5720@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <[🔎] 80.8.59.106.1378162815.1102448770@webmail.katamail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 80.8.59.106.1378162815.1102448770@webmail.katamail.com>
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-pot_a_miel: honeypot@kheops.frmug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by onera.onera.fr id iB87E1XU016556
Delivered-To: 284657-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Quoting debianiquetamere@katamail.com (debianiquetamere@katamail.com):

I won't translate your login name to fellow d-i developers..:-))


> The installer asked me for my IP and other networking infos despite the=
 boot option passed (netcfg/disable_dhcp=3Dtrue); I felt blocked there bu=
t courageously managed to go to the menu, and chose the next option. :) D=
uring partitioning, after creating 3 main partitions, I looked for a way =
to create an extended partition, and after 10 minutes of unsuccessful tri=
als I found out it was created automatically as I created a fourth partit=
ion.

If you ask for disabling dhcp, then you get IP configuration
questions. That's logical..:-)

Please note that IP parameters cannot currently be preseeded.

> The install then proceeded smoothly.
> Post-install problems I had to solve myself (now everything is fine!):
> - no sound ! I had to install alsa myself (I read sarge goes the 2.4 ke=
rnel + OSS way in the mailing-list). That would be nice if alsa was insta=
lled automatically with the 2.6 kernel. A total newbie wouldn't know abou=
t it and feel disappointed by the silence of debian.

I experienced the same problem (basically, see my exchanges with
Thomas Hood, recently in debian-boot). IIRC, the main reason is that
ALSA is not the default sound layer in sarge, but still OSS is.

Don't telle me this is Good or Bad...I have no clue about it.

Anyway, this is considered out of scope for the installer....

> Go bubulle! Champagne pour tout le monde! Bonne f=EAtes =E0 tous! ; )

s/bubulle/all other d-i people/

I'm afraid that bubulle alone would never have written the very first
line of d-i..:-)

Given that this install report is a complete success report, I do as
usual with successful install report=A0: I close the bug..:-)

This does not of course mean you weren't right to report. Knowing the
installations are correct is important for the d-i team.

Many thanks for yourtime testing the Debian Installer and reporting
your results. Have fun with your new Debian system!




Reply to: