[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#282706: marked as done (install: dist-upgrade woody -> sarge (well done))



Your message dated Wed, 24 Nov 2004 07:05:05 +0100
with message-id <20041124060505.GS13101@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug#282706: install: dist-upgrade woody -> sarge (well done)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2004 21:43:00 +0000
>From koenigstein@cs.uni-duesseldorf.de Tue Nov 23 13:43:00 2004
Return-path: <koenigstein@cs.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Received: from kleinbonum.cs.uni-duesseldorf.de (augustiner.dbs.uni-duesseldorf.de) [134.99.2.113] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CWiRA-0005Gw-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:43:00 -0800
Received: from guido by augustiner.dbs.uni-duesseldorf.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CWiQe-0000pF-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:42:28 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Guido Koenigstein <koenigstein@cs.uni-duesseldorf.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: install: dist-upgrade woody -> sarge (well done)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:42:28 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1CWiQe-0000pF-00@augustiner.dbs.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Sender: <guido@dbs.uni-duesseldorf.de>
X-BadReturnPath: guido@dbs.uni-duesseldorf.de rewritten as koenigstein@cs.uni-duesseldorf.de
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: install
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Hello all,
this weekend I did a dist-upgrade on our file-server.
Short: everything went fine.
Long:
This machine is our main NFS, YP, SambaPDC, Cups, DNS(local),
and DHCP-server.
It serves about 10 workstations and 5 laptops. Most of them are using
windows, but I'm working on it. At least I wanted a new version of samba
and Cups. Kernel was taken from sarge for a long time, because of no
support for tg3 on woody. 
What I've done:
Logged in through ssh ;-), backup-ed /etc, removed preferences with
pinning to stable. Changed sources.list to a local mirror (because of
speed), made apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade.
Negated all changes to configuration files (see above programs) and half
an hour later I got a new system. The only problem I encountered,
was rejecting of double-sided printing on three printers.
Reconfigured them with new ppds from cups and everything went fine again.

I'm very impressed! Never saw such a simple upgrade, like within debian.
Thanks a lot for your good work.

Sincerely yours

Guido

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282706-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2004 06:56:37 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Tue Nov 23 22:56:36 2004
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CWr4u-0003Wi-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:56:36 -0800
Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by onera.onera.fr  with ESMTP id iAO6uYXU015897;
        Wed, 24 Nov 2004 07:56:34 +0100 (MET)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
	id 93CE7232A3; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 07:05:05 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 07:05:05 +0100
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Guido Koenigstein <koenigstein@cs.uni-duesseldorf.de>,
        282706-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#282706: install: dist-upgrade woody -> sarge (well done)
Message-ID: <20041124060505.GS13101@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <[🔎] E1CWiQe-0000pF-00@augustiner.dbs.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1CWiQe-0000pF-00@augustiner.dbs.uni-duesseldorf.de>
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-pot_a_miel: honeypot@kheops.frmug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by onera.onera.fr id iAO6uYXU015897
Delivered-To: 282706-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


> I'm very impressed! Never saw such a simple upgrade, like within debian.
> Thanks a lot for your good work.


Given that this install report is a complete success report, I do as
usual with successful install report=A0: I close the bug..:-)

This does not of course mean you weren't right to report. Knowing the
installations are correct is important for the d-i team.

Many thanks for yourtime testing the Debian Installer and reporting
your results. Have fun with your new Debian system!

(especially in your case, taking care of reporting a successful
woody->sarge upgrade was really helpful)



Reply to: