[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#275714: marked as done (LVM on RAID unavailable)



Your message dated Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:47:05 -0400
with message-id <20041025154705.GA5801@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#275714: partman: LVM on RAID unavailable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2004 18:05:32 +0000
>From fabbe@paniq.net Sat Oct 09 11:05:32 2004
Return-path: <fabbe@paniq.net>
Received: from pinchy.nma.fi [212.226.144.241] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CGLb1-0005uD-00; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:05:32 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pinchy.nma.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60605B41B
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat,  9 Oct 2004 21:05:24 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from pinchy.nma.fi ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (pinchy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
	id 32393-02-5 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
	Sat, 9 Oct 2004 21:05:14 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from 192.168.2.207 (ws251.matinraitti.kolumbusasiakas.com [217.152.61.251])
	by pinchy.nma.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D79B3F5
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat,  9 Oct 2004 21:05:11 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: LVM on RAID unavailable
From: Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe@paniq.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 21:05:03 +0300
Message-Id: <[🔎] 1097345103.3972.5.camel@kernel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at nma.fi
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debian-installer
Version: Daily snapshot 20041008
Severity: normal

When creating a RAID array in partman, there is no option to use the
array as storage for LVM. I can create a RAID array and then manually
use pvcreate and vgcreate to activate LVM on it. After that, I can
create logical volumes using partman, format them, and choose mount
points for them.

It would be nice if I could choose to use a RAID array as LVM PV.

Cheers,
-- 
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe@paniq.net>


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275714-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2004 15:45:51 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Mon Oct 25 08:45:51 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CM72d-00061j-00; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:45:51 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2282117E02;
	Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:45:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 003A96E13C; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:47:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:47:05 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe@paniq.net>, 275714-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#275714: partman: LVM on RAID unavailable
Message-ID: <20041025154705.GA5801@kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 1098697613.6570.3.camel@dop-5.cs.helsinki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1098697613.6570.3.camel@dop-5.cs.helsinki.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 275714-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> This seems to be resolved in the daily build from
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20041022/sarge-i=
386-netinst.iso
>=20
> So I guess it's ok to close this bug now?

Yep, I missed this bug.

--=20
see shy jo

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBfR/4d8HHehbQuO8RAuUMAKDrSpD9OXy2LtEfCQUTI3vhlneToACgolJm
behsULPvky+fa3UeUQosKPM=
=IXWJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--



Reply to: