Bug#247627: marked as done ([i386] [beta4] [netinst] no !386 kernels on netinst CD)
Your message dated Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:56:17 -0400
with message-id <20041014175617.GB4963@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#247627: about your Debian installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2004 01:42:18 +0000
>From apollock@daedalus.andrew.net.au Wed May 05 18:42:18 2004
Return-path: <apollock@daedalus.andrew.net.au>
Received: from daedalus.andrew.net.au [210.18.204.2] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLXty-0008AF-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 18:42:18 -0700
Received: from daedalus.andrew.net.au (apollock@daedalus.andrew.net.au [127.0.0.1])
by daedalus.andrew.net.au (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) with ESMTP id i461gF0x018809
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 6 May 2004 11:42:15 +1000
Received: (from apollock@localhost)
by daedalus.andrew.net.au (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) id i461gFKN018807
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 6 May 2004 11:42:15 +1000
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 11:42:14 +1000
From: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: INSTALL REPORT
Message-ID: <20040506014214.GA18789@daedalus.andrew.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: beta4
uname -a:
Linux brutus 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:
Thu May 6 11:33:32 EST 2004
Method: Booted from the netinst CD, used ftp.au.debian.org, transparently
proxied
Machine: Noname PIV
Processor: Intel PIV
Memory: 256M
Root Device: IDE, /dev/hda2
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 7295 58597056 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda2 7296 7357 498015 83 Linux
/dev/hda3 7358 7419 498015 83 Linux
/dev/hda4 7420 14593 57625155 8e Linux LVM
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 ext3 478M 56M 398M 13% /
tmpfs tmpfs 132M 0 132M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/base/home
ext3 2.1G 8.5M 1.9G 1% /home
/dev/base/tmp ext3 1.1G 8.5M 945M 1% /tmp
/dev/base/usr ext3 2.1G 92M 1.9G 5% /usr
/dev/base/var ext3 2.1G 69M 1.9G 4% /var
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
Install went smoothly as usual.
Usual problems:
* Picked the 386 kernel instead of the 686 kernel
* Discover is still spewing lots of crap (#236423)
I still think the way the partitioner displays things after setting up LVM is
a bit screwy, it's hard to work out how to continue, because it's hidden up
the top, and the first instinct is to scroll to the bottom... If I can get
qemu to work, I'll try and get a screenshot.
New problems:
os-prober reckoned there wasn't another OS installed and so didn't setup GRUB
for my Win2K installation.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 247627-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 20:41:18 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Thu Oct 14 13:41:10 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CICPO-0007LF-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:41:10 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162B717F1D;
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:54:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5EBB66E111; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:56:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:56:17 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>
Cc: 247627-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#247627: about your Debian installation report
Message-ID: <20041014175617.GB4963@kitenet.net>
References: <20041013205421.A54AB6E3DC@dragon.kitenet.net> <20041014003002.GG13083@daedalus.andrew.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041014003002.GG13083@daedalus.andrew.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 247627-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I think this report can be closed. IIRC, the reason there are no optimised
> kernels on the netinst CD is because of size constraints, and I'm of the
> understanding this won't be an issue on the full Sarge CD images.
That's correct. Closing this report.
--=20
see shy jo
--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBbr3Bd8HHehbQuO8RAo69AKC4RHaIU8B5suDDS2TWyYDdWQulTwCfRjGn
f0jQc+HCV79IsMoXfWfmHzs=
=6wW3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT--
Reply to: