[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#230445: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst CD] various problems)



Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:08:45 -0400
with message-id <20041013200845.GA20198@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing old installation reports due to lack of info
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2004 23:38:56 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jan 30 15:38:56 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AmiDw-0000Sh-00; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:38:56 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-50.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.50])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF9B18059
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:38:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9FBB56ECB2; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:46:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:46:34 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: FWD: "INSTALL REPORT" d-i
Message-ID: <20040130234634.GJ3742@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liqSWPDvh3eyfZ9k"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--liqSWPDvh3eyfZ9k
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: installation-reports
=20
 The following installation report was posted to debian-boot, and,
 according to my records, never followed up on. I am putting it in the
 BTS so it will not be lost.

----- Forwarded message from Markus Amersdorfer <der.plusch@subnet.at> -----

=46rom: Markus Amersdorfer <der.plusch@subnet.at>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:47:21 +0100
To: tfheen@debian.org
Subject: "INSTALL REPORT" d-i
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 20040103,
http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-neti=
nst.iso
uname -a:
  Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Date: 20040119, 14:30
Method: Booted from CDROM, nothing special.

Machine: HP Pavilion k345
  See http://produkte.hp-austria.at/catalog/1065 for a link
  to specifications. Changes made to the machine: Additional RAM,
  additional NIC (with Realtek 8139D).
Processor: Athlon XP 2800+
Memory: 786 MB DDR-RAM (PC2700)
Root Device: IDE (Primary Master)
Root Size/partition table:
  First partition (60 GB) NTFS with HP's default OS.
  Second (also primary) partition (10 GB) "Linux"
  (I created this partition with the d-i's "cfdisk" program).

Output of lspci: (Using Knoppix 3.3)
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400 AGP] Host
Bridge
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 PCI Bridge
00:05.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
  RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
00:07.0 Communication controller: Intel Corp. 536EP Data Fax Modem
00:0c.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host
  Controller (rev 46)
00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 80)
00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 80)
00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 80)
00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 82)
00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge
00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
  VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE
 (rev 06)
00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc.
  VT8233/A/8235 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 50)
00:12.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102
  [Rhine-II](rev 74)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation
  NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] (rev a1)


Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [E]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

1. Problem:
-----------
The problem occured after partitioning the disk and choosing "Finish":
The install process just "hung". Watching kernel messages on ALT+F3 (I
think), it said the following:

  Using /lib/modules/..../jbd.o
  Using /lib/modules/..../ext3.o
  Using /lib/modules/..../reiserfs.o
  Using /lib/modules/..../jfs.o
  insmod: xfs.o: no module by that name found
  modprobe: failed to load module xfs

Checking /lib/modules/.../, I couldn't find xfs.o by hand either.

Pressing CTRL+C resulted in "nothing" once and in a "Kernel Ooops"
twice.


2. Problem (general Linux-Problem!?):
-------------------------------------
The VIA-Rhine-II NIC (onboard) is not properly supported by the kernel.
Though it is recognized and the module is loaded, the NIC doesn't work
(no DHCP, etc.).
As I had the same problems with the Mandrake 9.2 install CD, I think
it's just a Linux kernel problem, so nothing directly related to d-i.


3. "HCI":
---------
"Configure the Network" should IMHO show the kernel-module assigned to
the available NICs listed. This way it would be possible to distinguish
between 2 different NICs (such as is the case in my machine: Via Rhine
and Realtek).
Currently, it only says "eth0" and "eth1", one has to guess here ...


4. "HCI":
---------
In case of DHCP-failure, it would be great if one could go back to the
NIC-menu without having to go through the manual network-settings and
finally have a - for an unexperienced user probably quite overwhelming -
menu of all possibly d-i steps.


Anyway, many thanks for your great and hard work!

Cheers,
Markus A.


--=20
The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged.
                       <Cpt. Picard, "The Drumhead", StarTrek TNG>

http://homex.subnet.at/~max/



----- End forwarded message -----
--=20
see shy jo

--liqSWPDvh3eyfZ9k
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAGuzad8HHehbQuO8RAr3lAKCMXQaRRkCEuo7/7bXJ8HEjEGt/3ACfY/3S
KX5xXbyzi1Q5vGLB1cM2934=
=9ena
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--liqSWPDvh3eyfZ9k--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230445-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 01:56:23 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Wed Oct 13 18:56:22 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CHuqs-0003wr-00; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:56:22 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7170B18619;
	Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:07:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BB8996E111; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:08:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:08:45 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 227917-done@bugs.debian.org, 229772-done@bugs.debian.org,
	230445-done@bugs.debian.org, 230630-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing old installation reports due to lack of info
Message-ID: <20041013200845.GA20198@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 230445-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3


--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm closing this installation report, since request(s) for more information
were not answered. If you still experience the problem, or if you can tell
us the information we originally asked for, please write back and tell us.

Note that much newer versions of the installer are now available, which fix
a lot of bugs, including possibly the ones you reported.

--=20
see shy jo

--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBbYtNd8HHehbQuO8RAtjhAJ4iLGLgvAxoNBUc7ppkhHBJgf1ruQCcDnaC
P+ylOrZkDGuOgcKPuArN4pA=
=9oGw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--



Reply to: