[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#272893: marked as done (installation-reports: sarge installer: no PPPoE choice offered during network configuration)



Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:01:29 -0400
with message-id <20041013200129.GA20060@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing dup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2004 16:50:47 +0000
>From domi.dumont@free.fr Wed Sep 22 09:50:47 2004
Return-path: <domi.dumont@free.fr>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CAAKN-0005nZ-00; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:50:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (stmartindheres-2-82-225-140-65.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.140.65])
	by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E73D3173ECF; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:50:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from domi by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CAAKJ-0004nm-3v; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:50:43 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: installation-reports: sarge installer: no PPPoE choice offered during
 network configuration
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:50:42 +0200
Message-Id: <E1CAAKJ-0004nm-3v@localhost>
Sender: Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: domi.dumont@free.fr
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on localhost); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports
Version: sarge installer: No PPPoE offered during network setup
Severity: important

Hello

I've just done a debian network install for a system connected to 
internet with PPPoE and ADSL.

The installation went fine (great installer!) except for the network
setting part (just before apt configuration).

The only choice offered were direct ethernet or PPP over serial line.
The installer does not clearly state that choosing ppp will try to set 
up ppp over serial line instead of ppp over ethernet, so it's easy to 
get confused.

The installer should also offer a PPPoE choice which would call 
pppoeconf. 

I had to launch a shell and call pppoeconf, which worked without a 
problem. 

Cheers


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_IE@euro, LC_CTYPE=en_IE@euro

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 272893-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 00:46:23 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Wed Oct 13 17:46:22 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CHtl8-0004hn-00; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:46:22 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AF118C05
	for <272893-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:00:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 26D836E111; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:01:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:01:29 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 272893-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing dup
Message-ID: <20041013200129.GA20060@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 272893-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The lack of pppoe configuration is filed as bug #265908 against
base-config.

--=20
see shy jo

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBbYmZd8HHehbQuO8RAvyLAJ9QCbBtJrFKl/EVkTxkH4O9g9DPNQCeLWhA
R4aRdEyCoxXUI8DAYATV2I0=
=Cgtm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--



Reply to: