[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#237320: marked as done ([i386] [20040406] [floppy] various problems)



Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400
with message-id <20041013203659.GA20340@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing old installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2004 23:44:57 +0000
>From mikon@absurd.mimuw.edu.pl Wed Mar 10 15:44:56 2004
Return-path: <mikon@absurd.mimuw.edu.pl>
Received: from fw-gw-atm.mimuw.edu.pl (absurd.mimuw.edu.pl) [193.0.96.15] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B1DNf-0004pD-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:44:55 -0800
Received: (from mikon@localhost)
	by absurd.mimuw.edu.pl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2ANioJ11491;
	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:44:50 +0100
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:44:50 +0100
Message-Id: <200403102344.i2ANioJ11491@absurd.mimuw.edu.pl>
From: Mikolaj Konarski <mikon@mimuw.edu.pl>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: installation-report 3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 06-Mar-2004, from http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/current/
uname -a: I'm on different install now
Date: 10-Mar-2004
Method: from floppy then network on a previously prepeared ext3 filesystem
from ftp.pl.debian.org, no proxy.

Machine: PC self made from trash parts
Processor: Pentium 120
Memory: 32M RAM
Root Device: IDE, hda1
Root Size/partition table: all on hda1, about 1700M
Output of lspci: I'm on different install now
This is intel/Zappa motherboard with chpiset 430FX, 
network card 3Com Etherexpress II TP (8 bit ISA).

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives:     [E]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [E]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]
First kernel start      [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

expert mode

Too small memory (32M).
As before I coped by removing all network modules after autodetection,
then removing all ide/pci modules, with the exception of piix.o,
before ide hardware detection.
Then a swap file and it run OK, kernel upload also OK (2.4.25).
GRUB OK, but after the rebott the machine reboots 
after it prints something about initrd (~5 lines of messages, total).
Will try with a rescue floppy now.

So it seems, the installed does not work on 32M,
but with additional superexpert mode,
where you choose which debian-installer components to skip
and which modules to choose (no autoprobing), 32M shoudl be enough.
On the other hand 24M seems impossible.

Cheers,
Mikolaj

-- 
mailto:mikon@mimuw.edu.pl
http://zls.mimuw.edu.pl/~mikon/home.html

Like Hardship, Risk & Challenge?  --- Follow Jesus!!

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237320-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2004 21:47:39 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Wed Oct 13 14:47:39 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CHqyA-00078W-00; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:47:38 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2575B1810F;
	Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:35:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C6B796E111; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 230705-done@bugs.debian.org, 232237-done@bugs.debian.org,
	236184-done@bugs.debian.org, 236293-done@bugs.debian.org,
	237295-done@bugs.debian.org, 237320-done@bugs.debian.org,
	237455-done@bugs.debian.org, 237508-done@bugs.debian.org,
	237542-done@bugs.debian.org, 237679-done@bugs.debian.org,
	237834-done@bugs.debian.org, 237846-done@bugs.debian.org,
	237901-done@bugs.debian.org, 238042-done@bugs.debian.org,
	230122-done@bugs.debian.org, 238495-done@bugs.debian.org,
	238504-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing old installation-reports
Message-ID: <20041013203659.GA20340@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 237320-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7


--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm closing this old installation report, since it looks to me like all the
problems reported in it are old and fixed. There are much newer versions of
the debian installer available, that fix lots of bugs. If you're able to
try one and verify that the problems you reported are fixed (or file a new
report if not), that would be great.

Thanks for your installation report.

--=20
see shy jo

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBbZHrd8HHehbQuO8RAh+GAKDRX7bxhNlBf7bBpmM3BwnErCpeFQCfTvrK
q0ckVhnUPx+u+Pf9VD48lDs=
=Pdl/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--



Reply to: