Bug#263162: marked as done (Please describe your tasksel policy, and re-add the tex task)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:57:04 +0200
with message-id <20041012135704.GB1840@preusse>
and subject line Please describe your tasksel policy, and re-add the tex task
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 08:05:27 +0000
>From frank@debian.org Tue Aug 03 01:05:27 2004
Return-path: <frank@debian.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BruIZ-0001Nw-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 01:05:27 -0700
Received: from [212.227.126.209] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1BruIY-0001ni-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:05:26 +0200
Received: from [82.194.101.27] (helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1BruIY-0005SX-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:05:26 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BruHo-0002dY-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:04:40 +0200
Received: by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:04:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Kuester <frank@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Please describe your tasksel policy, and re-add the tex task
Bcc: Frank Kuester <frank@debian.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 08:04:39 +0000
Message-Id: <E1BruHo-0002dY-00@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:3fc7da83a58b7314ee3070631872032d
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.09
Severity: normal
In version 2.00, the tex task was removed, and the changelog says:
/---------------------------
| Adopted new, stricter criteria for task additions. Removed the following
| tasks, which did not meet it: [...] tex
\---------------------------
I could not find those criteria written in any of the bug reports, or
in /usr/share/doc/tasksel. There was also no explanation why
specifically the tex task (and the science task, too) was removed.
I would be happy to cooperate with you and provide a new, better tex
task, but I need to know the criteria first.
Please note that I am on vacation until 2004-08-15. I think the other
maintainers of the teTeX packages at
debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org will also help you.
Regards, Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages tasksel depends on:
ii aptitude 0.2.15.5-2 terminal-based apt frontend
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30 Debian configuration management sy
ii liblocale-gettext-perl 1.01-17 Using libc functions for internati
-- debconf information:
tasksel/title:
tasksel/first:
tasksel/tasks:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263162-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2004 13:57:36 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Tue Oct 12 06:57:36 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CHN9j-0005Bp-00; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:57:36 -0700
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.101 #44)
id 1CHN9F-0006sF-00
for 263162-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:57:05 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:57:04 +0200
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:57:04 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 263162-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Please describe your tasksel policy, and re-add the tex task
Message-ID: <20041012135704.GB1840@preusse>
References: <E1BruHo-0002dY-00@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1BruHo-0002dY-00@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.11(0.116/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 263162-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On 03.08.04 Frank Kuester (frank@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
> In version 2.00, the tex task was removed, and the changelog says:
>
> I could not find those criteria written in any of the bug reports, or
> in /usr/share/doc/tasksel. There was also no explanation why
> specifically the tex task (and the science task, too) was removed.
>
> I would be happy to cooperate with you and provide a new, better tex
> task, but I need to know the criteria first.
>
> Please note that I am on vacation until 2004-08-15. I think the other
> maintainers of the teTeX packages at
> debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org will also help you.
>
We had a short discussion on tetex-maint. We agreed that it doesn't
make that much sense to have a tex task. Joey already pointed out the
reasons. I've opened #276173 against tetex-bin, requesting a short
file, that lists and describes packages associated to tetex-bin. This
bug is hereby obsolete and I'm closing it.
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: