[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255835: marked as done (Can't load sr_mod on sparc64)



Your message dated Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:14:42 -0700
with message-id <20040925221441.GA11552@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2004 11:02:47 +0000
>From weinen@enterprise.ph2.uni-koeln.de Wed Jun 23 04:02:47 2004
Return-path: <weinen@enterprise.ph2.uni-koeln.de>
Received: from enterprise.ph2.uni-koeln.de [134.95.66.111] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bd5Wg-0007w8-00; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:02:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  (IDENT: uid 2225)
  by enterprise.ph2.uni-koeln.de with esmtp; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:02:05 +0200
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:02:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jonas Weinen <weinen@enterprise.ph2.uni-koeln.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0406231219280.16936@enterprise.ph2.uni-koeln.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 20040622 sarge-sparc-businesscard
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sat Apr 24 01:43:10 EDT 2004 sparc64 unknown
Date: 06/23/04 
Method: boot cdrom (businesscard) w/o any parameters to silo
Machine: Sun Ultra60, NEC CDROM DRIVE:466 at scsi1:sym-2.1.17a
Processor: UltraSPARC-II 360MHz
Memory: 256MB
Root Device: 
Root Size/partition table: 
Output of lspci:

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network:         [ ]
Detect CD:              [E]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives:     [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
System boots up from CD without problems. CD-ROM detection ends up with 
"Error while running 'modprobe -v sr_mod'.
'modprobe sr_mod' says:
> Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-sparc64/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o
> insmod: ELF file /lib/modules/2.4.26-sparc64/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o not for this architecture
> insmod: Could not load the module: No such file or directory
> modprobe: failed to load module sr_mod

No chance getting network to work for continuing installation.

--
Jonas Weinen
weinen@ph2.uni-koeln.de

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 255835-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2004 22:14:43 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Sat Sep 25 15:14:43 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp800.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.179] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CBKoV-0006Jg-00; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:14:43 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.177.192 with login)
  by smtp800.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2004 22:14:42 -0000
Received: from darjeeling (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7])
	by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AA82A9542
	for <255835-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CBKoU-00030T-00
	for <255835-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:14:42 -0700
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:14:42 -0700
To: 255835-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <20040925221441.GA11552@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: 255835-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi Jonas,

this bug has been fixed a few months ago in busybox-cvs. Please try a
new image (rc1 should be new enough) and reopen the bug if it still
doesn't seem to be fixed.

Thanks

-- 
Joshua Kwan



Reply to: