Bug#264560: marked as done (misses 3com 3c905-TX)
Your message dated Sat, 25 Sep 2004 01:19:12 +0200
with message-id <20040924231912.GK3664@soziologie.ch>
and subject line Bug#264560: could you retest debian-installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 12:20:42 +0000
>From yojik77@club-internet.fr Mon Aug 09 05:20:42 2004
Return-path: <yojik77@club-internet.fr>
Received: from relay-5m.club-internet.fr [194.158.104.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bu98s-0006lN-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 05:20:42 -0700
Received: from club-internet.fr (l05m-8-113.d2.club-internet.fr [62.34.13.113])
by relay-5m.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B71E057
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:20:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <41176D71.50204@club-internet.fr>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:26:25 +0200
From: Yojik77 <yojik77@club-internet.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5
X-Accept-Language: fr, en-us, ru, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package: installation-reports
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official NetInst Snapshot i386=20
Binary-1 (20040801)
installation August second (1st step) - August third & fourth (2nd step)
uname -a:
Linux Nacha-Machina 2.4.26-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 22 12:46:23 JST 2004 i686=20
GNU/Linux
Date: <Date and time of the install>
Method: Netinstall -- no-floppy boot =3D> directly on CD :: no proxy
Machine: OEM Home-Made PC :: Motherboard : K7S5A rev. 3.1 ::
Processor: AMD Duron 1100 Mhz
Memory: 640 Mo SDRAM (512pc100 + 128pc133)
Root Device: IDE Seagate 60 Go
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/hda5 / ext3 defaults,errors=3Dremount-ro 0 1
/dev/hda12 /tmp ext3 defaults 0 2
/dev/hda13 /usr ext3 defaults 0 2
/dev/hda11 /var ext3 defaults 0 2
/dev/hda3 none swap sw 0 0
/dev/hdb /media/cdrom0 iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0
/dev/hdc /media/cdrom1 iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0
/dev/fd0 /media/floppy0 auto rw,user,noauto 0 0
This section has been "hand-made" when I was sure the system was=20
operationnal as a whole (my fat32 "old-data" partitions & former=20
mandrake 9.2 /home, fully cleaned-up) :
/dev/hda2 /mnt/win_c vfat=20
ro,user,auto,umask=3D007,uid=3D0,gid=3D1000,iocharset=3Diso8859-15 0 0
/dev/hda7 /mnt/win_d vfat=20
rw,user,auto,umask=3D002,uid=3D0,gid=3D1000,iocharset=3Diso8859-15 0 0
/dev/hda8 /mnt/win_e vfat=20
rw,user,auto,umask=3D002,uid=3D0,gid=3D1000,iocharset=3Diso8859-15 0 0
/dev/hda9 /mnt/win_f vfat=20
rw,user,auto,umask=3D002,uid=3D0,gid=3D1000,iocharset=3Diso8859-15 0 0
/dev/hda6 /home ext3 defaults 0 2
****
****
Output of lspci:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 735 Host (rev =
01)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Virtual=20
PCI-to-PCI bridge (AGP)
0000:00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513=20
(LPC Bridge)
0000:00:02.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0=20
Controller (rev 07)
0000:00:02.3 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0=20
Controller (rev 07)
0000:00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE]=20
(rev d0)
0000:00:02.6 Modem: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] AC'97 Modem=20
Controller (rev a0)
0000:00:0b.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Lucent Microelectronics FW323 (rev 04)
0000:00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M=20
[Tornado] (rev 30)
0000:00:0f.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1=20
(rev 06)
0000:00:0f.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game=20
Port (rev 06)
0000:00:11.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M=20
[Tornado] (rev 74)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11=20
[GeForce2 MX/MX 400] (rev a1)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [0]
Configure network HW: [E]
Config network: [E]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [?]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [E]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
<Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
and ideas you had during the initial install.>
*** Configure Network HW :
I've got the same NIC twice (3com 3c905-TX). Surprisingly, the installer=20
didn't find them itself : I had to edit /etc/modutils/aliases et=20
/etc/modules (and run update-modules) after the first boot so as the=20
modules get loaded and linked to my NICs.
*** Config Network :
Real problemn, still now, 5 days later : I do config as root my aDSL=20
link (France / Club-Internet : pppoe) with pppoeconf, everything's fine=20
: it detect my two NIC, the Speedtouch Home ethernet (STH Alcatel)=20
concentrator, grab my username, password, DNS, I ask for launch at start=20
and launch now, OK, it works fine !!
But, although I explicitly asked for launch at boot : at next launch :=20
It did not !
I tried commenting my second NIC in aliases (it is useless at that point=20
: no LAN) expecting it will make it easier =3D> Nop !!
I tried many other tricks too but nothing helped.
I really believed for somes times it could be an IRQ probleme but I'm=20
not so sure now !? Maybe a troube with rp-pppoe, getting confused with=20
two NICs (rp-pppoe config was also exceedingly tricky with mandrake 9.x) =
?
So, each time I have to log as root and pppoeconf again (happily my=20
*long* username and DNS servers are saved...). Not a friendly way to the=20
internet, is it ?
I'm still looking for a longtime solution, except taking out the second,=20
and certainly guilty in some way, NIC !?
**** General Config :
1=B0) About Xfree86 :
The built-in util has failed to config it proprerly. startx crashed in a=20
miserable way, so I had to do it again but with dpkg-reconfigure=20
xfreeserver-xfree86. No it's fine, but it could have been fine at first.
Sadly, I didn't have the brain to keep the first xfree and xfree-4=20
config files !!
2=B0) About locales :
More an enhancement : I get used to UTF-8. At the end of the=20
configuration, I didn't know which locales was implemented and how to=20
configure. I found doc after that but shouldn't it be a part of the=20
installation process ??!
Hope I've been helpfull (could have been more for sure :-( !!)
Ciao,
Yojik
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 264560-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2004 23:30:36 +0000
>From gaudenz@soziologie.ch Fri Sep 24 16:30:36 2004
Return-path: <gaudenz@soziologie.ch>
Received: from smtprelay02.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.40.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CAzWN-0002YT-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:30:35 -0700
Received: from tigerente (dhcp-sn164-08.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.164.18])
by smtprelay02.uni-oldenburg.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8ONUXCk022534;
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 01:30:33 +0200
(envelope-from gaudenz@soziologie.ch)
Received: from steinlin by tigerente with local (masqmail 0.2.20) id
1CAzLM-800-00; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 01:19:12 +0200
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 01:19:12 +0200
From: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@soziologie.ch>
To: Yojik77 <yojik77@club-internet.fr>
Cc: 264560-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#264560: could you retest debian-installer
Message-ID: <20040924231912.GK3664@soziologie.ch>
References: <20040924172201.GE3664@soziologie.ch> <415485F4.4060309@club-internet.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <415485F4.4060309@club-internet.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.0.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.9.24.2
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CD 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
Delivered-To: 264560-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=20
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:39:16PM +0200, Yojik77 wrote:
> Gaudenz Steinlin a =E9crit :
> >Could you please either retest d-i with the latest daily image or update
> >discover1 and discover1-data to the latest versions and run "discover
> >--module all" and see if the output contains 3c59x.
> >
> >Thanks for testing=20
>=20
> The output :
>=20
> # discover --module all
>=20
>=20
> ohci1394
>=20
>=20
> 3c59x
> 3c59x
These lines confirm that discover1-data is indeed correct. You should be
able to remove the 3c59x module from /etc/modules and discover should be
to load it.
Gaudenz
>=20
> ide-scsi
> emu10k1
> usb-ohci
> usb-ohci
> **********
>=20
> Don't know why there're those blanks lines ??
> USB, firewire and SBlaster are too fine !
>=20
> Because in a first move, I've installed discover, I must say it did=20
> perform harware detection during package configuration in synaptic...
>=20
> But your question was related to discover1 and you've got the correct=20
> output !!
>=20
> Hope it helps !!
>=20
>=20
> >Gaudenz
>=20
> Best regards,
>=20
> Yojik
>=20
--K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBVKtw8rUqXQpftocRAhueAJ9zNTDVkNBHchjMKadjoMw+kZ5MowCgzHqI
EpznDWrrkx/0H5SpR9VTzWw=
=Nod9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM--
Reply to: