Bug#256295: marked as done (discover1-data: Unhandled HW on my laptop (Thinkpad X30))
Your message dated Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:50:24 +0200
with message-id <20040924175024.GI3664@soziologie.ch>
and subject line no response from you -> closing this report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2004 22:08:23 +0000
>From pere@gigs.hungry.com Fri Jun 25 15:08:23 2004
Return-path: <pere@gigs.hungry.com>
Received: from 217-13-7-10.dd.nextgentel.com (localhost) [217.13.7.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bdyru-0008Fc-00; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:08:22 -0700
Received: from pere by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BdyrO-0000O9-00; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:07:50 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: discover1-data: Unhandled HW on my laptop (Thinkpad X30)
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Message-Id: <E1BdyrO-0000O9-00@localhost>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@gigs.hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:07:50 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: discover1-data
Version: 1.2004.02.08-8
Severity: minor
Some of the PCI devices on my IBM Thinkpad X30 laptop is not
recognized by discover1. I'm not sure if all of the devices need some
kernel module loaded, but at least the modem and the firewire device
could use some driver.
Here is the current list of PCI devices (using '(lspci;lspci -n)|sort'),
and their kernel module (and X config). Do you know which kernel
module should be loaded for the rest?
0000:00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:3575 (rev 04)
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset Host Bridge (rev 04)
agpgart
0000:00:02.0 Class 0300: 8086:3577 (rev 04)
0000:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82830 CGC [Chipset Graphics Controller] (rev 04)
0000:00:02.1 Class 0380: 8086:3577
0000:00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corp. 82830 CGC [Chipset Graphics Controller]
XFree86 module i810
0000:00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:2484 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.2 Class 0c03: 8086:2487 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 02)
usb-uhci
0000:00:1e.0 Class 0604: 8086:2448 (rev 42)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 42)
?
0000:00:1f.0 Class 0601: 8086:248c (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801CAM ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 02)
?
0000:00:1f.1 Class 0101: 8086:248a (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801CAM IDE U100 (rev 02)
?
0000:00:1f.3 Class 0c05: 8086:2483 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM SMBus Controller (rev 02)
?
0000:00:1f.5 Class 0401: 8086:2485 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
i810_audio
0000:00:1f.6 Class 0703: 8086:2486 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 02)
?
0000:01:00.0 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev a8)
0000:01:00.0 Class 0607: 1180:0476 (rev a8)
0000:01:00.1 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev a8)
0000:01:00.1 Class 0607: 1180:0476 (rev a8)
yenta_socket
0000:01:00.2 Class 0c00: 1180:0552
0000:01:00.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Ricoh Co Ltd R5C552 IEEE 1394 Controller
?
Loading kernel module ohci1394 worked. I'm not sure if it is the
correct driver, as I don't have any firewire equipment for testing.
0000:01:02.0 Class 0280: 1260:3873 (rev 01)
0000:01:02.0 Network controller: Intersil Corporation Prism 2.5 Wavelan chipset
(rev 01)
orinoco_pci
0000:01:08.0 Class 0200: 8086:1031 (rev 42)
0000:01:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82801CAM (ICH3) PRO/100 VE (LOM) Ethernet Controller (rev 42)
e100
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 256295-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2004 18:01:30 +0000
>From gaudenz@soziologie.ch Fri Sep 24 11:01:30 2004
Return-path: <gaudenz@soziologie.ch>
Received: from smtprelay01.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.40.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CAuNu-0008AS-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:01:30 -0700
Received: from tigerente (dhcp-sn164-08.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.164.18])
by smtprelay01.uni-oldenburg.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8OI1SN9019952
for <256295-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:01:28 +0200
(envelope-from gaudenz@soziologie.ch)
Received: from steinlin by tigerente with local (masqmail 0.2.20) id
1CAuDA-1oa-00 for <256295-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004
19:50:24 +0200
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:50:24 +0200
From: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@soziologie.ch>
To: 256295-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: no response from you -> closing this report
Message-ID: <20040924175024.GI3664@soziologie.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IvGM3kKqwtniy32b"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.0.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.9.23.6
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CD 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
Delivered-To: 256295-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--IvGM3kKqwtniy32b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Petter
As you did not submit any additional information for some time and the
most important issues from your report are already solved, I'm closing
this report. Feel free to reopen if you have more info.
Gaudenz
--IvGM3kKqwtniy32b
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBVF5g8rUqXQpftocRAkq5AJ9GWdLhwvApHu4/2BYBaVegoHwmpQCgx5NE
I54igiPmonn8v/F/712QIxM=
=rXLP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IvGM3kKqwtniy32b--
Reply to: