[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Parted still fails to see partitions - Was: Bug#269036 not fixed in parted 1.6.11



Hi,

I have now tried the newest builds - still no way to install on this machine because of the failure to detect the existing partitions properly.

I have used the following files
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso 13-Sep-2004 23:41  34.6M
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/2.6/initrd.gz               13-Sep-2004 12:32   3.0M 
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/2.6/vmlinuz                 13-Sep-2004 12:32   1.0M 

to boot from hard disk. Inside the installer, my partition table is not found. 
So I start a shell.

* uname -a tells me:

Linux notebook-mz 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Mon Aug 16 03:02:48 EDT 2004 i686 unknown

* fdisk -l says:

Disk /dev/discs/disc0/disc: 36.3 GB, 36344161280 bytes
240 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4694 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 = 7741440 bytes

                Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/discs/disc0/part1   *           1        2349    17758408+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/discs/disc0/part2            4695        5168     3583440   41  PPC PReP Boot
/dev/discs/disc0/part3            2350        3321     7348320    c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/discs/disc0/part4            3322        4694    10379880    5  Extended
/dev/discs/disc0/part5            3738        3805      514080   82  Linux swap
/dev/discs/disc0/part6            3806        4694     6720808+  83  Linux
/dev/discs/disc0/part7            3322        3737     3144928+  83  Linux

Partition table entries are not in disk order

* parted says:

GNU Parted 1.6.11 with HFS shrink patch 12.5
[...]
Using /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
                                                                          
Error: Can't have a partition outside the disk!
                                                                          
Information: The operating system thinks the geometry on
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc is 70421/16/63.  Therefore, cylinder 1024
ends at 503.999M.

* in dmesg, I find the following lines:

hda: IC25N040ATMR04-0, ATA DISK drive
Using anticipatory io scheduler
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
hdc: DW-225, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
hda: max request size: 128KiB
hda: Host Protected Area detected.
	current capacity is 70984690 sectors (36344 MB)
	native  capacity is 78140160 sectors (40007 MB)
hda: 70984690 sectors (36344 MB) w/1740KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63, UDMA(100)
 /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 p3 p4 < p5 p6 p7 >



It might also be interesting that I had first downloaded the initrd.gz and vmlinux for kernel 2.4, and parted also fails to detect the partition table.

The resulting question is still the same:
how can I install sarge on this machine?

Thank you,

Matthias

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mzenker@gnotometrics.de [mailto:mzenker@gnotometrics.de] 
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:39 PM
> To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Bug#269036 not fixed in parted 1.6.11
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have had some problems with parted not recognizing my disk 
> partitions recently (see 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/08/msg03147.html and 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/08/msg03247.html).
> Now after one week of absence, I have tried to install again, 
> and unfortunately the behaviour is unchanged.
> 
> I have used
> 
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040
> 909/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso 09-Sep-2004 23:06  41.6M 
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-09-10/hd-media
> /2.6/initrd.gz               10-Sep-2004 12:30   3.0M
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-09-10/hd-media
> /2.6/vmlinuz                 10-Sep-2004 12:30   1.0M 
> 
> to boot from hard disk. The partitioner still does not detect 
> my partitions, so I cannot install. When I start fdisk from 
> the shell, I see my partitions. When I start parted from the 
> shell, I get the following output:
> 
> snip++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> GNU Parted 1.6.11 with HFS shrink patch 12.5
> Copyright (C) 1998 - 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This program is free software, covered by the GNU General 
> Public License.
> 
> This program is distributed in the hope that it will be 
> useful, but WITHOUT ANY
> WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of 
> MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the 
> GNU General Public License for more details.
> 
> Using /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
> 
> Error: Can't have a partition outside the disk!
>                                                               
>             
> Information: The operating system thinks the geometry on 
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc is 70421/16/63.  
> Therefore, cylinder 1024 ends at 503.999M.
>                                                               
>             
> (parted) 
>                                                               
>             
> Information: Don't forget to update /etc/fstab, if necessary.
> 
> snap++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Questions:
> * what can I do to install Sarge? Can I circumvent parted in 
> some way? (It seems to me that there should be some 
> possibility to do this, unless you expect to have parted 
> absolutely bulletproof at release time...)
> 
> * what can I do to help track down this bug, which 
> information do you need? I have a running SUSE Linux 9.0 (2.4 
> kernel) on that machine, and can also boot Knoppix with a 2.4 
> or 2.6.1 kernel.
> 
> Matthias
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> GN Otometrics -- Hortmann	
> Dipl.Phys. Dr. Matthias Zenker
> Entwicklung / Development
> Auchtertstraße 4, D-72770 Reutlingen
> Tel. ++49(0)7121/99435-60, Fax -79
> eMail: mzenker at gnotometrics dot de
> http://www.hortmann.de		
> 
>  
> 
> 



Reply to: